References 411Ray, I. (1983). A treatise on the medical jurisprudence of insanity.
New York: DaCapo Press. (Original work published 1838)
Rex v. Arnold (Kingston upon Thames Assizes), 16 State Trials 695
(1812).
Rieber, R. W., & Green, M. (Eds.). (1981). Milestones in the history
of forensic psychology and psychiatry.New York: DaCapo Press.
Robinson, E. S. (1935).Law and the lawyers.New York: Macmillan.
Rock v. Arkansas, 107 S. Ct. 2804 (1987).
Roesch, R., & Golding, S. (1980). Competency to stand trial.
Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Roesch, R., Golding, S., Hans, V. P., & Reppucci, N. D. (1991).
Social science and the courts: The role of amicus briefs. Law and
Human Behavior, 15,1–11.
Roesch, R., Grisso, T., & Poythress, N. G. (1986). Training pro-
grams, courses, and workshops in psychology and law. In M. F.
Kaplan (Ed.), The impact of social psychology on procedural
justice(pp. 83–108). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Roesch, R., Zapf, P., Golding, S., & Skeem, J. (1999). Defining and
assessing competency to stand trial. In A. Hess & I. Weiner
(Eds.),The handbook of forensic psychology(2nd ed., pp. 327–
349). New York: Wiley.
Saks, M. J. (1986). The law does not live by eyewitness testimony
alone.Law and Human Behavior, 10,279–280.
Schetky, D., & Benedek, E. (1992). Clinical handbook of child psy-
chiatry and the law.Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
Schulman, J., Shaver, P., Colman, R., Emrick, B., & Christie, R.
(1973, May). Recipe for a jury. Psychology Today,37–44,
79–84.
Shuman, D. W., & Sales, B. D. (1999). The impact of Daubertand
its progeny on the admissibility of behavioral and social science
evidence.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5,3–15.
Simon, R. (1983). The defense of insanity. Journal of Psychiatry
and Law, 11,183.
Slesinger, D., & Pilpel, M. E. (1929). Legal psychology: A bibliog-
raphy and a suggestion. Psychological Bulletin, 12,677–692.
Sporer, S. L., Malpass, R. S., & Koehnken, G. (Eds.). (1996).Psycho-
logical issues in eyewitness identification.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Steadman, H., Mulvey, E., Monahan, J., Robbins, P., Appelbaum,
P., Grisso, T., et al. (1998). Violence by people discharged
from acute psychiatric facilities and by others in the same neigh-
borhoods.Archives of General Psychiatry, 55,393–401.
Stern, L. W. (1906). Zur psychologie der aussage. Zeaschrift fur die
qesamte Strafrech-swissenschaft, 23,56–66.
Stern, L. W. (1910). Abstracts of lectures on the psychology of
testimony. American Journal of Psychology, 21,273–282.
Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293 (1967).
Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425,
551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (1976).
Thompson, W. C. (1989). Death qualification after Wainright v.
Witt and Lockhart v. McCree. Law and Human Behavior, 13,
185–215.
Thornburgh v. American College of Physicians and Surgeons, 106
U.S. (1986).
Tomkins, A. J., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1990). Training and career op-
tions in psychology and law. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 8,
205–216.
Underwager, R. W., & Wakefield, H. (1992). Poor psychology pro-
duces poor law. Law and Human Behavior, 16,233–243.
United States v. Ahmad, 366 F. Supp. 1356 (1973).
United States v. Amaral, 488 F.2d, 1148 (9th Cir., 1973).
United States v. Briggs, Cr. No. 14950, Middle District of Pennsyl-
vania, Harrisburg Division. (1973).
United States v. Durham, 214 F.2d 862 (1954).
United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967).
Walker, N. (1968). Crime and insanity in England: The historical
perspective, Vol. 1.Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University
Press.
Wall, P. C. (1965). Eyewitness identification in criminal cases.
Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Watkins v. United States Army, 837 F.2d 1428, rch’g en blanc
granted, 847 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1988).
Weiner, I., & Hess, R. (1987). The handbook of forensic psychology.
New York: Wiley.
Weinreb, L. (1986). Criminal law(4th ed.). Mineola, NY: Univer-
sity Casebook Series.
Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness testimony research: System
variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 36,1546–1557.
Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identifica-
tions?American Psychologist, 48,553–571.
Whipple, G. M. (1909). The observer as reporter: A survey of the
“psychology of testimony.”Psychological Bulletin, 6,153–170.
Whipple, G. M. (1912). Psychology of testimony and report.
Psychological Bulletin, 9,264–269.
Whipple, G. M. (1915). Psychology of testimony. Psychological
Bulletin, 12,221–224.
Whipple, G. M. (1918). The obtaining of information: Psychology
of observation and report. Psychological Bulletin, 15,217–248.
Wigmore, J. H. (1909). Professor Münsterberg and the psychology of
testimony: Being a report of the case ofCokestone v. Münsterberg.
Illinois Law Review, 3,399–445.
Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970).
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 350 (1968).
Woocher, F. D. (1986). Legal principles governing expert testimony
by experimental psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 10,
47–61.
Wrightsman, L. S. (2000). Forensic psychology.Belmont, CA:
Wadsworth.
Yarmey, A. D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony.New
York: Free Press.