2021-01-23NewScientist

(Steven Felgate) #1
54 | New Scientist | 23 January 2021

Seeing small


What is the smallest animal with
eyes and could it see a molecule?

Hillary Shaw
Newport, Shropshire, UK
It depends what one means
by “see”, “eye” and “molecule”.
A single cell could be light-
sensitive, but it would only “see”
shades of light and dark. Does
seeing imply some degree of
comprehension, rather than
just instinctual action such as
light-avoidance? That would
necessitate an eye that could
focus and form an image on a
retina and a brain capable of
understanding that image.
The smallest image that could
then be “seen” would be the size
of one light-detecting cell, which
is considerably larger than a
molecule, unless you count
things such as long-chain
polymer plastics as a molecule.
We are almost certainly the
only animal whose brain “knows”
what a molecule is, anyway.

Lewis O’Shaughnessy
Nottingham, UK
Camera-type eyes like those
possessed by humans, with a lens
to focus light captured through
an aperture onto photoreceptors,

are fascinatingly complex with
many different tissues playing
unique and essential roles.
This complexity limits the
minimum size of such eyes, which
is why smaller animals often have
proportionally larger eyes. Still,
this kind of eye can be remarkably
small – minute vertebrates
possess these complex eyes,
including Brookesia micra, a
tiny species of chameleon.
For even smaller eyes, insects
are a good place to look. Their eyes
are much simpler than ours

Want to send us a question or answer?
Email us at [email protected]
Questions should be about everyday science phenomena
Full terms and conditions at newscientist.com/lw-terms

The back pages Almost the last word


GI
RO

SC

IEN

CE

/SC

IEN

CE
PH

OT

O^ L

IBR

AR

Y

and so the images are much
less clearly defined – a bit like
reducing the number of pixels
on your computer screen.
We could look even smaller
(and this is where we stretch
the definition of an eye). Some
bacteria can produce light-
sensitive proteins, which might
guide their navigation. Not quite
an eye as we would normally
consider it, but not bad for
single-celled organisms.

Richard Bradford
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
The problem is that, no matter
how small the animal, it wouldn’t
be able to discern an individual
molecule using visible light.
To make out an object, the
wavelength of light hitting it
has to be shorter than the size
of the object being observed.
The wavelength of visible light

ranges from about
400 nanometres (violet) to
700 nm (red) whereas a water
molecule is about 0.27 nm across
its largest dimension. Even a
large molecule, such as DNA, has
a diameter of only about 2 nm.

In a spin


Earth spins round the sun, the sun
round the galaxy and galaxies spin
on their axes. Where does all this
spin come from? The big bang?

Mike Follows
Sutton Coldfield,
West Midlands, UK
The formation of star clusters
and galaxies is due to fluctuations
in the density of cosmic matter,
and hence gravity’s pull. The fact
that all these objects are spinning
is due to the conservation
of angular momentum.

Clumps of dark matter formed
first, and acted as “seeds” for the
formation of structures, providing
gravitational potential wells that
pulled in atoms of normal matter.
If these potential wells and all
the matter falling into them had
all been perfectly spherically
symmetric (that is, symmetric
along any axis) then there would
be no spin. However, when one
atom doesn’t fall towards the very
centre of the well, it produces a
tiny torque, which becomes
accentuated as the clump of
matter collapses. This is due
to the conservation of angular
momentum, observed when
a figure skater spins faster as
they pull in their arms.
The change in spin radius as
a vast molecular cloud collapses
into a star is so enormous that
an imperceptible spin in the
cloud manifests itself as a
spinning solar system with
planets orbiting a star.

Guy Cox
St Albans, New South
Wales, Australia
It is a case of spin or fall in. After
the big bang, matter moved away
from its origin at high speed. We
know from the cosmic microwave
background that the distribution
of matter wasn’t uniform – if it
had been, the universe as we
know it wouldn’t exist.
Wherever there was a
concentration of matter, gravity
tended to pull it closer together,
and eventually the first stars were
formed. For matter to avoid falling
into a star, it had to have sufficient
angular momentum to orbit it,
forming the accretion disc from
which planets coalesced. These
planets in turn attracted material,
some of which circled around
them and became moons. The
same applies at a larger scale, with
stars attracting other stars and so
forming galaxies. The big bang
gave linear motion. Gravity
turned it into orbital motion.

This week’s new questions


Pull the other one If there are other universes, would our
universe feel their gravity? Don Kearley, Sydney, Australia

Fear and trembling Why do our hands shake when we are
nervous? Michael Crouch, Norwich, Norfolk, UK

In a multiverse, can the
different universes feel
the gravity of the others?

“ No matter how small


an eye is, it wouldn’t
be able to discern
a single molecule
using visible light”
Free download pdf