74 Moral Philosophy: Ideas of Good and Evil, Right and Wrong
only have to know the good to do it (remember Plato?), but man
is imperfect, flawed by original sin, and needs to develop and
perfect moral and intellectual virtues in order to do good.
Aquinas contends that a good act has four criteria:
- the intrinsic value of the act;
- the intention of the actor;
- circumstances which affect the actor and/or the act;
- the end result of the act. For an act to be perfect (in a moral
sense) all four of these criteria must be met.
For example: - A person wishes to give food to the poor
- because his intention is to do good and help others less
fortunate than himself. - He proceeds to buy the food and delivers it to the local soup
kitchen - where the poor are fed. Thus, it is a perfect act in intrinsic
value, intent, circumstance, and result. We can also write many
scenarios in which most of the conditions are present and some
good results. A perfect act, however, must meet all the criteria.
For example: - A person wishes to give food to the poor
- because his intention is to do good and help others less
fortunate than himself. - He proceeds to buy the food and delivers it to the local soup
kitchen where it is destroyed by a fire, - so the poor are not fed.
There is great merit in many aspects of the act described, and
much moral good, but it is obviously not a perfect act—the good
result was lacking.
The perfect and the less than perfect acts described above
seem fairly easy to distinguish. There are, however, some acts
that are more difficult to judge. For example: - A person wishes to give food to the poor
- because his intention is to win the next political election.
- He proceeds to buy the food and delivers it to the local soup
kitchen, - where the poor are fed.
A perfect moral act? Not according to Aquinas. A perfect
moral act must satisfy the demands of reason both in intention
and ends. We could get into some really fine-line arguments