The Economist - USA (2021-02-06)

(Antfer) #1
The EconomistFebruary 6th 2021 Business 51

2


1

comes across as detail-oriented and more
than a little nerdy—much like Mr Bezos in
his first couple of decades in charge.
That does not mean that nothing will
change. Although Bernstein expects Ama-
zon’s retail-related revenues to remain at
roughly two-thirds of the total in the next
few years, by 2024 digital adverts may be its
biggest source of profits, overtaking cloud
computing; retail may actually add materi-
ally to the bottom line (see chart). Last year
Jeff Wilke, who ran the mammoth retail
arm, said he would leave the company, de-
priving Mr Jassy of an able lieutenant.
Customers in America are beginning to
grumble that Amazon is becoming a flea
market, with ever shoddier products juiced
with faked reviews. This has yet to stop
them shopping there, as the latest results
attest. But it could turn into a problem.
Abroad, where sales grew briskly last year,
the incoming boss will have to decide
whether to pursue expansion in places like
South America and India, where Amazon
faces stiff local competition.
At least one investor worries that Mr Jas-
sy’s background in cloud-computing may
leave him struggling to direct the firm’s re-
tail arm. Meanwhile, those who would
prefer to see the money-spinning aws
hived off into a separate company may
wonder if the man who created it has any
more appetite for such a radical move than
Mr Bezos did.
Those aren’t the only dilemmas in Mr
Jassy’s in-tray. Amazon’s demands on
workers in its warehouses and at times in-
trusive surveillance have come under scru-
tiny. The firm has spent heavily on im-
proved working conditions and pays a $15
minimum wage in America. But it contin-
ues to attract criticism, especially as it re-
sists unionisation among logistics work-
ers. Many of aws’s well-paid programmers
empathise with their colleagues on the
warehouse floor. In May Tim Bray, an aws
executive, quit in disgust over what he de-
scribed as Amazon’s “chickenshit” sacking
of workers who had complained about
poor safety during the pandemic.
Amid a general souring on the Utopian
promises of big tech, Amazon’s success has
also attracted attention from American
trustbusters. They worry it may be using
sales data from the third-party sellers on its
platform to inform the development of in-
house products which then drive those
sellers out of business. A congressional re-
port in 2020 cited claims that Amazon used
the rich profits from awsto subsidise its
unlucrative retail operations—but said
that the firm had not provided the data nec-
essary to decide one way or another. Some
politicians have talked of barring Amazon
from competing with its third-party sell-
ers, or even of splitting it up. Amazon de-
nies doing anything wrong.
Some speculate that such looming po-

litical awkwardness may have influenced
the timing of Mr Bezos’s decision to stand
back. Perhaps. Mr Bezos, for his part, gives
every indication of being a man with a
higher calling. When Bill Gates stepped
down as the boss of Microsoft in 2000, he
threw himself wholeheartedly into the
Gates Foundation, which, as the world’s
biggest private charity, funds everything
from malaria-prevention to aidsresearch.
Mr Bezos, whose near-$200bn fortune
is even larger than Mr Gates’s, may be plan-
ning a similar change of focus. He is sym-
pathetic to at least some environmental
concerns: he has said before that growing
resource consumption is not compatible
with a finite planet. Of his many other busi-
nesses, Blue Origin, his rocketry firm, is
widely reckoned to be his favourite. Like
Elon Musk, who this year overtook him as
the world’s richest man, Mr Bezos is a fully
paid-up space cadet. Blue Origin is already
involved in America’s plans to return astro-
nauts to the moon.
In 2019 Mr Bezos sketched out a vision
of the future in which a trillion humans
live in gigantic, artificial space-going habi-
tats, relieving the pressure on a crowded
Earth. It is an apocalyptic idea—and, to put
it mildly, a bold one. To Mr Bezos it may
seem more fun than running an online de-
partment store with a sideline in server
farms and virtual billboards—even one as
era-defining as Amazon. 7

Welcome to the Jassy age
Amazon

Sources:Bloomberg;BernsteinResearch

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0
20001997 151005 21

$trn

Revenues

Market capitalisation

Initial public offering
Marketplace launch
Amazon Web
Services launch

Buys Whole Foods

60

40

20

0

-20
2423222120192018

Operatingprofitbysegment,$bn

Retail& other

AmazonWeb
Services

Advertising

FORECAST

G


ottlieb daimlerand Carl Benz built
the world’s first motor cars at the same
time in 1886, not far apart in Germany.
Their names have been tied together since
a merger of their firms in 1926. Daimler is
the parent company of Mercedes-Benz. Yet
the two men never met. So perhaps they
would not have minded that on February
3rd it was announced that their names
would go their separate ways.
A majority stake in Daimler Truck, the
group’s lorry-and-bus business, will be
spun off to existing shareholders and listed
in Frankfurt later this year. The luxury-car
arm, to be renamed Mercedes-Benz, will
retain a minority stake. The manoeuvre has
set pulses racing in the staid lorry busi-
ness. Ola Kallenius, the group’s boss, called
it an “emotional and exciting day”.
The split is an acknowledgement that
making cars and lorries are not the same
business. Mr Kallenius noted the different
“customer groups, technology paths and
capital needs”. Car buyers care about
brands, styling and plush interiors. Busi-
nesses with wares to ferry are concerned
with the total cost of ownership, not what
the badge says about them as a person.
Electric lorries will probably run on hydro-
gen, not batteries, which are too expensive.
Splitting also has the advantage of giv-
ing investors a clear choice between which
business they favour. It could unlock hid-

Daimler Truck and Mercedes-Benz
part ways

Carmaking

Driving apart


No truck with cars
Free download pdf