THE E 63 WAGON
JUST SNORTS AND
GRUNTS AND HOLLERS
AND PUNCHES AND
KICKS AND SCREAMS.
and also provide feel, so I could stay out
of the ABS with ease. This wagon profile
is so much better for the Panamera. It’s
the only version I think is attractive.”
Anything he didn’t like? “I wish the
engine had more character and voice.”
Intellectually, I get that the Porsche
Panamera Turbo S Sport Turismo is
the superior car. But emotionally, the
Mercedes-AMG E 63 S wagon ... it just
snorts and grunts and thrusts and hollers
and roller-coasters and goes berserk
and punches and kicks and screams. It’s
Howard Dean in matte blue paint.
It’s crazy capable, too. Evans was in
the Panamera, and on a particular high-
speed stretch of road, I told him to go as
fast and as hard as he could. My thinking
was, if he really went for broke in the
Panamera, there would be no way the
AMG could keep up. But at the end of the
road, he said, “I couldn’t shake you.”
Damn skippy. To be fair to the Porsche,
I’ve rarely pushed a car as hard as I
pushed the AMG. Likewise, the way
in which the E 63 S kept up with the
Sport Turismo wasn’t pretty. Body roll,
tires screaming for mercy, hot plates
for brakes. Still, it kept up. Oh, and we
couldn’t even see the RS 6 in our mirrors.
After lapping all three around the Streets
of Willow, it was crystal clear the Porsche
is the best car, period. There’s sophisti-
cation to its chassis the other two simply
don’t possess. Yes, there’s a big price
premium for that sophistication, but in
this case, you get what you pay for.
“I swear Porsche engineers must spend
a lot of time watching how athletes and
animals move at full run,” Evans said.
Walton added, “The way the Turbo S
moves feels organic.”
The AMG was sloppy on the racetrack
but still felt better than the RS 6. “You
were on your mirrors in that last corner,”
the boys laughingly pointed out after I
climbed from the Audi. The AMG was
only ever on its door handles. Walton
made one final, notably valid point:
“Let’s not have another story where the
best driving car loses because it’s not
emotional enough.”
Again, I want to stress that this test
shouldn’t ever have happened. High-
performance wagons are supposed to be
a rare oddity in America, not plentiful
enough that a buff book can pull off a
three-way comparo. We’re supposed
The AMG came sporting the smallest
wheels. Also, we love the gold calipers.^ APRIL 2021 MOTORTREND.COM 31
0-60 MPH 3.1 sec 3.0 sec 2.7 sec
QUARTER MILE 11.5 sec @ 120.2 mph 11.2 sec @ 124.0 mph 11.0 sec @ 123.6 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 113 ft 104 ft 102 ft
FIGURE EIGHT 24.2 sec @ 0.81 g 24.2 sec @ 0.83 g 23.6 sec @ 0.86 g
NOTES 0-60 MPH Chalk up the Porsche’s launch advantage to its quicker-
engaging dual-clutch.
QUARTER MILE Notice the AMG’s trap speed is slightly higher by the end
of 1,320 feet. Chalk that up to the Mercedes-AMG’s weight-to-torque
advantage (7.4 pounds/lb-ft versus 8.0) and its shorter gearing from
second gear on.
FIGURE EIGHT The Audi tied the AMG in terms of time, though the
Mercedes’ road holding is a touch higher. The Porsche smacked both of
them. To illustrate how insane the Panamera’s 23.6-second time is (and
to show how great all three cars are), an Acura NSX clocked 23.8 seconds.
Mid-engine Corvette? We’ve tested two top-spec 3 LT Z51 models; one
did a 23.6, the other a 23.3. Man, the Porsche wagon is nuts.
2021 Audi RS 6
Avant
TEST TRACK SHOWDOWN
2021 Mercedes-
AMG E 63 S
4Matic+
2021 Porsche
Panamera Turbo S
Sport Turismo