Barron's - USA (2021-02-22)

(Antfer) #1

February 22, 2021 BARRON’S 39


MAILBAG


Send letters [email protected]. To be considered for


publication, correspondence must bear the writer’s name,


address, and phone number. Letters are subject to editing.


The Readback, a podcast taking you


inside the latest stories, is available


wherever you listen to podcasts.


The Next

Smart-Beta

Category?

To the Editor:

Kudos toBarron’sfor publishing your sustainability

rankings and highlighting the outperformance of the

companies on your list in recent years (“The 100 Most

Sustainable Companies,” Cover Story, Feb. 12).

I hope that the large environmental, social, and cor-

porate governance, or ESG, funds and exchange-traded

funds take notice of the delta between their holdings

and rankings such as these; otherwise, it’s possible

that any future underperformance may be driven by

factors outside of the ESG scope and the category may

become the next smart beta.

Dave Johnson

Brooklyn, N.Y.

To the Editor:

I was perplexed not to see on your list the most impor-

tant company in the first phase of the fight against cli-

mate change—Tesla. It’s dragging the world’s auto and

truck makers into the age of electric vehicles.

There will be (or already are) ripple effects to Big

Oil and Big Ag, which will be forced to change for the

betterment of the planet.

And Best Buy, a big-box reseller of

consumer electronics and consumer

durables, with more lives than a cat,

is No. 1?

John Norwood

West Des Moines, Iowa

To the Editor:

Have companies abandoned Milton

Friedman’s declaration that the sole

“social responsibility of business is to

increase its profits,” as Leslie P. Nor-

ton suggested? Quite the opposite, in

fact. Sustainable corporate actions

provide positive publicity while

avoiding a boycott against the com-

pany. The companies on your list are

acting in a publicly acceptable man-

ner in order to increase profits, just

as Friedman suggested.

Demetrius Pyo

Pittsburgh

Minimum Wages


To the Editor:

Although it is hard to refute that

raising the national minimum wage

could potentially cause job losses

for as many as 1.4 million people,

according to the Congressional Bud-

get Office, if that wage were raised

from $7.25 to $15 per hour, it is

equally challenging to assume that a

wage rate that was last adjusted

upward on July 24, 2009, should

not be upwardly adjusted as soon as

possible (“U.S. Minimum Wages

Have Already Jumped—With Mini-

mal Costs of Business,” The Econ-

omy, Feb. 12).

However, the cost of living varies

across the geographical locations

within the U.S., and taking such dif-

ferences into account when making

adjustments in the minimum wage

should go a long way toward mini-

mizing the potential job losses that

everyone brings up when debating

the pros and cons of raising the mini-

mum wage.

Bottom line: adjust the $15 na-

tional minimum wage for each state

based on that state’s cost of living.

Thus, states with lower COL will not

require the full $15, while higher

COL states will require a figure that

is closer to the $15 figure.

Anthony Chan

On Barrons.com

Moderna’s Prospects


To the Editor:

The Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech

vaccines have the same technology,

the same efficacy rates, and the same

cold-storage and distribution issues,

and both require a two-dose booster

regimen and are relatively easy to

modify for subsequent boosters to

deal with the inevitable mutations

(“How the Pandemic Is Changing the

Vaccine Industry,” Feb. 12).

The difference is that Moderna

has one technology and one ap-

proved product. In an industry

where Big Pharma and even biotech

stars like Gilead Sciences must ac-

quire smaller companies to have an

adequate pipeline, Moderna will be

bought out. The only question is

when and how much premium the

acquirer will pay.

In an era of loose, easy money, the

answer is probably sooner than you

think and more than you think is

reasonable.

Mark Perlsweig

On Barrons.com

Pot Stocks’ Future


To the Editor:

The fact that a significant percentage

of Americans (68%) support legaliza-

tion of cannabis doesn’t translate into

huge sales for any of these companies

(“Hot Money Has Lit Up the Canna-

bis Sector. Here are 4 Stocks to Try,”

Streetwise, Feb. 12).

Many people who were buying

occasionally from black market deal-

ers will probably continue with their

same source. Or maybe they will have

a delivery service bring them a few

joints.

But it’s not like tens of millions of

middle-age Americans are going to

become regular cannabis users over-

night just because it is legal.

Roughly 10% of the population

identifies as “regular users” (defined

as getting high once or twice a

month). Many people try it in their

youth, but most abandon it in

adulthood.

Long term, there will be federal

legalization and the big tobacco or

beverage companies will buy out the

small dispensaries. Once the novelty

that wears off, it will be just another

low-profit division of PepsiCo or

Philip Morris International.

Jason Winter

On Barrons.com

Mobius on Inflation


To the Editor:

I appreciate Mark Mobius’ views on

the flawed approach to measuring

inflation and how, using the current

system, inflation will be consistently

overstated (“Emerging Markets Will

Outperform After Covid, Longtime

Investor Mark Mobius Says,” Inter-

view, Feb. 12).

The result will be inappropriate

Federal Reserve policies that will

have a dampening effect on economic

growth. The Fed is slaying a dragon

that doesn’t exist.

Richard Kozak

On Barrons.com

“Adjust the $15 national minimum


wage for each state based on that


state’s cost of living.”


Anthony Chan, on Barrons.com
Free download pdf