Nature - USA (2020-09-24)

(Antfer) #1
Nature | Vol 585 | 24 September 2020 | 515

routine diagnostics, as has been reviewed recently^30 ,^148. Therapeutics
that target the microbiota are also emerging—including selective elimi-
nation of oncomicrobes, faecal transplantation of anti-tumorigenic
species and skewing the microbiota by oral supplementations or tar-
geted bacteriophage therapy^30 ,^149 ,^150. However, careful consideration
of any therapeutic avenue is required owing to the numerous effects
of the microbiome on the biology of the host, many of which are cur-
rently unknown.
To uncover the desired clinical potential of the microbiome in
CRC, we must continue to distinguish correlation and causation by
systematically adding knowledge to the layers of complexity. For exam-
ple, CRC-associated mutations are known to affect the way in which
cells respond to stimuli—such as a mutation in KRAS that increases
responsiveness to IL-22^151 —but whether such mutations affect host
colonization, dysbiosis and intercellular communications is unclear.
Importantly, we must decipher whether characteristics of specific
strains or the collective capabilities of an ‘oncogenic’ microbiota—
which encompasses bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea and their pro-
duced metabolites—alter disease. Owing to the vast intra-individual
heterogeneity in the microbiota, it is plausible that distinct strains in
different individuals will trigger a similar pathology through common
pathways. Therefore, targeting wide-spanning functions, rather than
specific taxa, might be the most effective strategy^152. Finally, although
we have focused on the microbiome in CRC, many of the underlying
mechanisms that we have discussed could be relevant to other diseases
such as IBD, in which certain bacteria—including E. coli and B. fragilis—
are similarly over-represented^153.


Conclusion


Various mechanisms have been revealed that begin to explain how
elements of the microbiota modulate tumorigenesis, broadly ranging
from alteration of the intestinal barrier and/or immune landscape to
reshaping the colonic ecological niche and the provision of genotoxic
insults (Fig.  1 ). Although host maladaptation and consequential barrier
breakdown is most probably critical in order to facilitate close proxim-
ity between the host and the microbiota, longitudinal multi-omics are
required to decipher the chronology of these ‘phases’ in tumour devel-
opment. To provide answers to the many open questions, an in-depth
understanding of how the microbiota mediates its effects in the context
of the tumour microenvironment—whether through direct effects on
DNA damage and inflammation or through other host-derived mecha-
nisms—is required. Fortunately, technological advances provide us
with revised tools to study the microbiota in the context of increasingly
physiological CRC model systems, in order to decipher the challenging
complexity of a colonic tumour microenvironment.



  1. Keum, N. & Giovannucci, E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk
    factors and prevention strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16 , 713–732 (2019).

  2. GBD 2017 Colorectal Cancer Collaborators. The global, regional, and national burden of
    colorectal cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories,
    1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet
    Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4 , 913–933 (2019).

  3. Lloyd-Price, J., Abu-Ali, G. & Huttenhower, C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome
    Med. 8 , 51 (2016).

  4. Garrett, W. S., Gordon, J. I. & Glimcher, L. H. Homeostasis and inflammation in the
    intestine. Cell 140 , 859–870 (2010).

  5. Belkaid, Y. & Hand, T. W. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell 157 ,
    121–141 (2014).

  6. Peterson, L. W. & Artis, D. Intestinal epithelial cells: regulators of barrier function and
    immune homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 14 , 141–153 (2014).

  7. Gehart, H. & Clevers, H. Tales from the crypt: new insights into intestinal stem cells. Nat.
    Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16 , 19–34 (2019).

  8. Zhou, L. & Sonnenberg, G. F. Essential immunologic orchestrators of intestinal
    homeostasis. Sci. Immunol. 3 , eaao1605 (2018).

  9. Karin, M. & Clevers, H. Reparative inflammation takes charge of tissue regeneration.
    Nature 529 , 307–315 (2016).

  10. Kinchen, J., et al. Structural remodeling of the human colonic mesenchyme in
    inflammatory bowel disease. Cell 175 , 372–386.e17 (2018).

  11. Dvorak, H. F. Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma
    generation and wound healing. N. Engl. J. Med. 315 , 1650–1659 (1986).
    12. Jess, T., Rungoe, C. & Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with
    ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. Clin. Gastroenterol.
    Hepatol. 10 , 639–645 (2012).
    13. Bogaert, J. & Prenen, H. Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Ann. Gastroenterol. 27 ,
    9–14 (2014).
    14. Wu, S., Powers, S., Zhu, W. & Hannun, Y. A. Substantial contribution of extrinsic risk factors
    to cancer development. Nature 529 , 43–47 (2016).
    15. Nomura, A. et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric carcinoma among Japanese
    Americans in Hawaii. N. Engl. J. Med. 325 , 1132–1136 (1991).
    16. Parsonnet, J. et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma. N. Engl.
    J. Med. 325 , 1127–1131 (1991).
    17. Elinav, E. et al. Inflammation-induced cancer: crosstalk between tumours, immune cells
    and microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13 , 759–771 (2013).
    18. Grivennikov, S. I., Greten, F. R. & Karin, M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 140 ,
    883–899 (2010).
    19. Punt, C. J., Koopman, M. & Vermeulen, L. From tumour heterogeneity to advances in
    precision treatment of colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14 , 235–246 (2017).
    20. Hanahan, D. & Weinberg, R. A. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 144 ,
    646–674 (2011).
    21. Galon, J. et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal
    tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 313 , 1960–1964 (2006).
    22. Galon, J. & Bruni, D. Tumor immunology and tumor evolution: intertwined histories.
    Immunity 52 , 55–81 (2020).
    23. Canli, O. et al. Myeloid cell-derived reactive oxygen species induce epithelial
    mutagenesis. Cancer Cell 32 , 869–883.e5 (2017).
    24. Sahai, E. et al. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated
    fibroblasts. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20 , 174–186 (2020).
    25. West, N. R., McCuaig, S., Franchini, F. & Powrie, F. Emerging cytokine networks in
    colorectal cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15 , 615–629 (2015).
    26. Reddy, B. S., Weisburger, J. H., Narisawa, T. & Wynder, E. L. Colon carcinogenesis in
    germ-free rats with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine and N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine.
    Cancer Res. 34 , 2368–2372 (1974).
    27. Wong, S. H. et al. Gavage of fecal samples from patients with colorectal cancer promotes
    intestinal carcinogenesis in germ-free and conventional mice. Gastroenterology 153 ,
    1621–1633.e6 (2017).
    Faecal transplantation of stools from patients with CRC into mice illustrates a
    carcinogenic role of CRC-associated microbiota.
    28. Olesen, S. W. & Alm, E. J. Dysbiosis is not an answer. Nat. Microbiol. 1 , 16228 (2016).
    29. Saus, E., Iraola-Guzmán, S., Willis, J. R., Brunet-Vega, A. & Gabaldón, T. Microbiome and
    colorectal cancer: roles in carcinogenesis and clinical potential. Mol. Aspects Med. 69 ,
    93–106 (2019).
    30. Wong, S. H. & Yu, J. Gut microbiota in colorectal cancer: mechanisms of action and
    clinical applications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16 , 690–704 (2019).
    31. Tilg, H., Adolph, T. E., Gerner, R. R. & Moschen, A. R. The intestinal microbiota in colorectal
    cancer. Cancer Cell 33 , 954–964 (2018).
    32. Garrett, W. S. The gut microbiota and colon cancer. Science 364 , 1133–1135 (2019).
    33. Ternes, D. et al. Microbiome in colorectal cancer: how to get from meta-omics to
    mechanism? Trends Microbiol. 28 , 401–423 (2020).
    34. Wirbel, J. et al. Meta-analysis of fecal metagenomes reveals global microbial signatures
    that are specific for colorectal cancer. Nat. Med. 25 , 679–689 (2019).
    35. Yan, Y. et al. Structure of the mucosal and stool microbiome in Lynch syndrome. Cell Host
    Microbe 27 , 585–600.e4 (2020).
    36. Touati, E. et al. Chronic Helicobacter pylori infections induce gastric mutations in mice.
    Gastroenterology 124 , 1408–1419 (2003).
    37. Cuevas-Ramos, G. et al. Escherichia coli induces DNA damage in vivo and triggers
    genomic instability in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107 , 11537–11542 (2010).
    38. Nougayrède, J. P. et al. Escherichia coli induces DNA double-strand breaks in eukaryotic
    cells. Science 313 , 848–851 (2006).
    39. Cougnoux, A. et al. Bacterial genotoxin colibactin promotes colon tumour growth by
    inducing a senescence-associated secretory phenotype. Gut 63 , 1932–1942 (2014).
    40. Goodwin, A. C. et al. Polyamine catabolism contributes to enterotoxigenic Bacteroides
    fragilis-induced colon tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108 , 15354–15359
    (2011).
    41. Wang, X. et al. Enterococcus faecalis induces aneuploidy and tetraploidy in colonic
    epithelial cells through a bystander effect. Cancer Res. 68 , 9909–9917 (2008).
    42. He, Z. et al. Campylobacter jejuni promotes colorectal tumorigenesis through the action
    of cytolethal distending toxin. Gut 68 , 289–300 (2019).
    43. Tomkovich, S. et al. Locoregional effects of microbiota in a preclinical model of colon
    carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 77 , 2620–2632 (2017).
    44. Cougnoux, A. et al. Small-molecule inhibitors prevent the genotoxic and protumoural
    effects induced by colibactin-producing bacteria. Gut 65 , 278–285 (2016).
    45. Lucas, C. et al. Autophagy of intestinal epithelial cells inhibits colorectal carcinogenesis
    induced by colibactin-producing Escherichia coli in ApcMin/+ mice. Gastroenterology 158 ,
    1373–1388 (2020).
    46. Pleguezuelos-Manzano, C. et al. Mutational signature in colorectal cancer caused by
    genotoxic pks+ E. coli. Nature 580 , 269–273 (2020).
    This pioneering study provides direct evidence of causality between pks+ E. coli and
    established CRC driver mutations.
    47. Wang, X., Yang, Y. & Huycke, M. M. Commensal bacteria drive endogenous
    transformation and tumour stem cell marker expression through a bystander effect. Gut
    64 , 459–468 (2015).
    48. Irrazabal, T. et al. Limiting oxidative DNA damage reduces microbe-induced
    colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 11 , 1802 (2020).
    49. Veziant, J. et al. Association of colorectal cancer with pathogenic Escherichia coli: focus
    on mechanisms using optical imaging. World J. Clin. Oncol. 7 , 293–301 (2016).
    50. Zhu, W. et al. Editing of the gut microbiota reduces carcinogenesis in mouse models of
    colitis-associated colorectal cancer. J. Exp. Med. 216 , 2378–2393 (2019).

Free download pdf