CancerConfidential

(pavlina) #1
Page 120

The test results of the “Indian study” are very significant. The non- cell phone
users had an average of only 4% of their cells with DNA damage. The persistent
mobile phone users showed an average of 39.75% cell DNA damage. The blood
of one 24-year-old male revealed 63% micronucleated cells. He had used a cell
phone for 1-2 hours per day for two years.


The hundreds of types of human cancers have one thing in common—they
all begin at the cellular level when DNA genetic material in one or more cells
becomes damaged. This damage can be passed from parents, or caused by the
effects of an environmental carcinogen. “...Genetic mutations in one single cell
are sufficient to lead to cancer,” says Dr. Henry Lai, awell-knownscientist at the
University of Washington, who has years of genetic and bioenergetics research to
his credit [“Evidence for Genotoxic Effects (RFR and ELF Genotoxicity)” Dr. Henry
Lai, Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Prepared for the
BioInitiative Working Group, July 2007, see BioInitiative Report].


Here’s another:


Prof Rony Seger, a cancer researcher at the Weizmann Institute of Science in
Rehovot, Israel, and colleagues exposed rat and human cells to electromagnetic
radiation at a similar frequency to that emitted by mobiles. The power of the
signal was around 1/10th of that from a mobile.


After just five minutes the researchers identified the production of extracellular
signal-regulated kinases (ERK1/2) – natural chemicals that stimulate cell division
and growth.


Cancers develop when the body is unable to prevent excessive growth and
division of cells in the wrong place.


Prof Seger said: “The real significance of our findings is that cells are not inert to
non-thermal mobile phone radiation.


“We used radiation power levels that were around 1/10th of those produced by a
normal mobile. The changes we observed were clearly not caused by heating.”


I can’t emphasize enough that there are far too many studies showing this
kind of result to ignore the problem. Scientists who say there is no problem are
being shockingly dishonest. They, of course, are paid by the telecommunication
companies to blow smoke in everyone’s eyes.

Free download pdf