306 Unit 7 Critical reasoning: Advanced Level
DOC 4
Activity
You have been asked to speak in a debate on
the future of the Olympic Games to an
audience of athletes, business people,
sports fans and others who are concerned
that the Games are falling into disrepute and
straying from their original ideals. The
previous speaker in the debate was Janet
Sender: your job is either to support or to
oppose her proposal.
Go through all the items again, including
Janet Sender’s article, and note down, or
highlight, any points that you feel to be
relevant to the argument you will be
constructing. There is no need to sort or
organise it at this stage: just compile a rough
list of points that you could make, and others
that you may need to respond to.
Commentary
Selection
Before you can begin to select and organise
relevant material from sources like these, you
need to be very clear what you are doing it
for – the task or assignment that has led you
to the documents in the first place.
There are some parts of the texts that are of
obvious significance, and some that are just as
obviously irrelevant. For instance, if you are
going to take up Janet Sender’s argument that
the interests of western Europe and the USA
have been served much better than those of
other nations, especially in the developing
world, the table of host cities would clearly be
useful evidence. Even if you decide to oppose
the previous speaker, you would need to
anticipate the accusation that the West has had
the lion’s share of the Olympic cake. Hence the
data in the table is relevant whether it will
strengthen your conclusion or challenge it.
The list of points you select will usually be a
mixture of fact and opinion, and it is important
not to confuse them. Generally speaking, facts
are neutral, unlike opinions or judgements. A
footprint in the snow is just that, an outline of
a foot, unless or until some significance is
attached to it. If it turns out to have the same
pattern as the boots owned by a defendant in a
murder trial, the footprint becomes a piece of
evidence. Similarly, the fact that the Olympic
Games were held in Atlanta in 1996 is a neutral
THE OLYMPIC CHARTER
Rights over the Olympic Games and Olympic properties
The Olympic Games are the exclusive property of the IOC (International Olympic Committee)
which owns all rights and data relating thereto, in particular, and without limitation, all rights
relating to their organisation, exploitation, broadcasting, recording, representation, reproduction,
access and dissemination in any form and by any means or mechanism whatsoever, whether now
existing or developed in the future.
The IOC
The IOC is an international non-governmental not-for-profit organisation. Members of the IOC
represent and promote the interests of the IOC and of the Olympic Movement in their countries
and in the organisations of the Olympic Movement in which they serve.