312 Answers to assignments
c There are four reasons, all closely
interdependent:
R1 No sport should be allowed in which
the prime object is to injure an
opponent.
R2 No sport should be allowed in which
the spectators enjoy seeing
competitors inflict physical harm on
each other.
R3 What boxers have to do, in order to
win matches, is to batter their
opponents.
R4 Boxers do this in front of large,
bloodthirsty crowds.
C Boxing should be one of the first
sports to be outlawed.
C
R1 & R3 R2 & R4
Alternatively R3 and R4 could be
reduced to one premise; but then it is
quite hard to show the structure. The
deeper analysis is more precise. (Note
that there is some room for variation in
the details of analysis.)
2.6 Complex arguments
1 E.g.
R1 R2
IC
C
R3
2 The map and accompanying images add
weight to the argument by emphasising
and/or specifying/quantifying the claim
made by R3. It could alternatively be
understood as evidence for R3, showing
what a small proportion of countries
there a point at which inserting such a
connective would make sense.
2 The second sentence is the best
expression of the conclusion: ‘The
machines are to blame.’ (It would not be
altogether wrong, however, to select the
first sentence.)
3 Variable responses
2.5 Analysing arguments
a R1 Bottled water is meant to be safe
but there have been several health
alerts.
R2 Bottled water costs a lot.
R3 Tap water is just as good; and tap
water is free. (This could be two
separate reasons.)
C People shouldn’t be fooled into
buying bottled mineral water.
R1 R2 R3 & R4
C
b R1 Drugs can make the difference
between winning gold and winning
nothing.
R2 The rewards are so huge... that
the risk will seem worth taking.
C There will always be some athletes
who will give way to the temptation.
R1 & R2
C
It is because R1 and R2 are both true
that the conclusion follows. If drugs
did not make a difference, or if the
rewards did not make the risk worth
taking, there would not be the same
temptation. So R1 and R2 are
interdependent.