95.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society22 (1): 53–56 (1984).
96.European Journal of Pharmacology40: 114–115 (1976).
97.Newsweek,December26,1988,p.50;“TSUShutsDown
CornellCatLab,”TheAnimals’Agenda 9 (3):22–25(March
1989).
98.S.Milgram,ObediencetoAuthority(NewYork:Harper
andRow,1974).Incidentally,theseexperimentswerewidely
criticizedon ethicalgrounds becausetheyinvolved human
beings without their consent. It is indeed questionable
whether Milgram should havedeceived participants in his
experimentashedid;butwhenwecomparewhatwasdoneto
themwithwhatiscommonlydonetononhumananimals,we
canappreciatehowfarmoresensitivemostpeoplearewhen
assessing the ethics of experimentation with humans.
- Monitor, a publication of the American Psychological
Association, March 1978. - Donald J. Barnes, “A Matter of Change,” in Peter
Singer, ed.,In Defense of Animals, pp. 160, 166. - The Death Sciences in Veterinary Research and
Education, (New York: United Action for Animals), p. iii.
102.JournaloftheAmericanVeterinaryMedicalAssociation
163 (9): 1 (November 1, 1973).
103.See Appendix 3 for the address.