would also call it “original blessing” or “original innocence”
(“unwoundedness”).*2
Whatever you call it, the “image of God” is absolute and unchanging. There is
nothing humans can do to increase or decrease it. And it is not ours to decide
who has it or does not have it, which has been most of our problem up to now.
It is pure and total gift, given equally to all.
But this picture was complicated when the concept of original sin entered the
Christian mind.
In this idea—first put forth by Augustine in the fifth century, but never
mentioned in the Bible—we emphasized that human beings were born into
“sin” because Adam and Eve “offended God” by eating from the “tree of the
knowledge of good and evil.” As punishment, God cast them out of the Garden
of Eden. This strange concept of original sin does not match the way we usually
think of sin, which is normally a matter of personal responsibility and
culpability. Yet original sin wasn’t something we did at all; it was something
that was done to us (passed down from Adam and Eve). So we got off to a bad
start.
By contrast, most of the world’s great religions start with some sense of
primal goodness in their creation stories. The Judeo-Christian tradition
beautifully succeeded at this, with the Genesis record telling us that God called
creation “good” five times in Genesis 1:10–22, and even “very good” in 1:31. The
initial metaphor for creation was a garden, which is inherently positive,
beautiful, growth-oriented, a place to be “cultivated and cared for” (2:15), where
humans could walk naked and without shame.
But after Augustine, most Christian theologies shifted from the positive vision
of Genesis 1 to the darker vision of Genesis 3—the so-called fall, or what I am
calling the “problem.” Instead of embracing God’s master plan for humanity and
creation—what we Franciscans still call the “Primacy of Christ”—Christians
shrunk our image of both Jesus and Christ, and our “Savior” became a mere
Johnny-come-lately “answer” to the problem of sin, a problem that we had
largely created ourselves. That’s a very limited role for Jesus. His death instead
of his life was defined as saving us! This is no small point. The shift in what we
valued often allowed us to avoid Jesus’s actual life and teaching because all we
needed was the sacrificial event of his death. Jesus became a mere mop-up
exercise for sin, and sin management has dominated the entire religious story
line and agenda to this day. This is no exaggeration.