Plant Biotechnology and Genetics: Principles, Techniques and Applications

(Brent) #1

Covello VT (1983): The perception of technological risks: A literature review.Tech Forecasting
Social Change 23 :285–297.
Crichton M (1990):Jurassic Park. Alfred A Knopf, New York, 416.
Durant J (1992):Biotechnology in Public: A Review of Recent Research. Science Museum London.
Graham D (Nov 20, 1996): Altering food called “dangerous experiment.”Toronto Star, E1.
Greenpeace (Oct 4, 2001): Fishtomato.com. Retrieved Oct 4, 2001, from http://www.fishtomato.com/.
Gregory R, Slovic P, Flynn J (1995): Risk perceptions, stigma, and health policy.Health Place 2 :
213–220.
Groth E (1991): Communicating with consumers about food safety and risk issues.Food Technol
45 :248–253.
International Food Information Council (IFIC) (2002):U.S. Consumer Attitudes toward Food
Biotechnology: More U.S. Consumers Expect Biotech Benefits. Wirthlin Group Quorum Survey.
Kaesuk Yoon C (May 20, 1999): Altered corn may imperil butterfly, researchers say.New York
Times, A1.
Kelley J (1995): Public Perceptions of Genetic Engineering: Australia 1994. Australian Department
of Industry, Science and Technology, Canberra. Retrieved Sept 10, 2007 from http://www.das.
gov.au/~dist/home.html.
Losey JE, Raynor LS, Carter ME (1999): Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae.Nature 399 :214.
PEW Initiative on Food Biotechnology (2002):Three Years Later: Genetically Engineered Corn
and the Monarch Butterfly. Retrieved Sept 10, 2007, from http://www.foodsafetynetwork.ca/gmo/
monarch.pdf.
Powell DA, Leiss W (1997): Mad Cows and Mother’s Milk. McGill-Queen’s Univ Press,
pp 123–152.
Sandman PM (1987): Risk communication: Facing public outrage.EPA J 13 :21.
Smith A, MacKinnon JB (2007):The 100-Mile Diet: A Year of Local Eating. Random House Canada.
US National Research Council (NRC) (1989):Improving Risk Communication. Committee on Risk
Perception and Communication. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 332.


REFERENCES 355
Free download pdf