installed in its space area, could also be installed artificial parks
equipped with centrifugal gravity itself is not essential to go to the
planet to see them.
ADVANTAGES OF LIVING IN SPACE OR EARTH
Future societies will have to decide which is better, if you live in
stable space stations in planetary orbit or live on the surfaces of
planets or moons, of course planets with excessive gravity as
Jupiter would be rejected, but instead its moons which offer great
expectations for future societies. These planets could however
serve as a reserve gas for inhabited planets or to supply reaction
mass to the interstellar ships. Each of these life forms has
advantages and disadvantages without being very clear which is
better.
Living in orbit means to choose one wants gravity at will by using
the rotational cylinder, and live on planetary surfaces means
having the planet and its resources readily available without
having to bridge the gap to the orbit.
Prolonged stay in an environment with low gravity could cause
loss of bone and muscle mass, this could be offset favoring the
increase in stature of the inhabitants, this increase can promote
muscle as a matter of kinetic mechanics would otherwise be
reduced minimizing the use of machinery and thus encouraging
citizens to make maximal exercise.
In space would be free from earthquakes, hurricanes, excessive
atmospheric pressures, opaque atmosphere or volcanic activities
such as well as to synchronize its translation into a period of
twenty four hours, but the convenience of having the planet closer
and accessible would be lost.
In addition magnetic gravity systems previously raised are not a
genuine effective systems rather are systems of auxiliary gravity
and although only were used for the moments of walking and
moving are not comparable to those of centrifugal type, it is also
true that many planets and moons have their own gravity and
magnetic methods would only be a complement, albeit in low
gravity moons would highlight and could potentially be