tRaditional authoRity, loCal GoVERnmEnt & JustiCE 193
the nationalist era utilized traditional networks for their popular support;
indeed it was the success of the sectarian parties in gaining rural support
through their religious orders and the Native Administration that partly
prompted criticism of the system from those also opposed to these
parties. Relatives of the Native Administration leaders have often had
greater access to education and pursued political, military, international
or other professional careers. Many leading Sudanese politicians have
originated from chiefly families. At the local or regional level, powerful
patronage networks have formed, headed by the Native Administration,
religious leaders, merchants and wealthy landowners and farmers. In the
town where John’s case was heard, both the county judge and the county
commissioner, as well as a number of officials in the county or state
government, come from the two or three leading families of chiefs. Such
local or regional elites have formed and cemented over the last century
or more, and have provided greater political continuity than have the
changing governments and varying administrative policies.
The strength of these local elites, and the overlaps between effendiya
and Native Administration, was particularly apparent in the lead-up
to and aftermath of the 1971 Local Government Act. The professional
administrative officers serving in local government campaigned against
the abolition of Native Administration from the mid-1960s, convinced
that the traditional leadership was vital to the preservation of basic order
and security, and the collection of taxes. Even after the removal of former
Native Administration leaders from the new councils and courts, local
government officers continued to turn to them for advice and assistance
in resolving disputes, especially as the local governments struggled with
the perennial problems of understaffing and lack of resources. It was in
fact these administrative officers who by the 1980s began to call for a
reinstatement of Native Administration in Darfur and eastern Sudan, in
order to deal with escalating conflicts over grazing and other resource
issues.
There may be, then, less of a traditional-modern dichotomy in local
government and more of a tension between administrators – both Native
The Sudan Handbook, edited by John Ryle, Justin Willis, Suliman Baldo and Jok Madut Jok. © 2011 Rift Valley Institute and contributors Administration and civil servants – and politicians or military leaders.
(www.riftvalley.net).