Chapter 14 page 325
Figure 14.4 An example of an diagrammatic representation. After extended discussion, two students
working together have added the arrows shown in red.
Key:
Evidence weakly supports the explanation.
Evidence supports the explanation
Evidence strongly supports the explanation
X
X
Evidence contradicts the explanation
Evidence strongly contradicts the explanation
Evidence neither supports nor contradicts the explanation
Explanation A: Sam is guilty
Evidence 1
Sam Spade’s
blood type is O+,
and O+ blood
was found on the
broken window
of the
convenience
store.
?
Evidence 2
Sam regularly
buys
newspapers in
this store.
Evidence 3
Sam Spade was
observed spending
a large amount of
money at the horse
races the day after
the robbery.
Explanation B: Sam is innocent