Chapter 15 page 345
Therefore, students may be more likely to be actively engaged in learning during group work than in whole-
class discussions.
Much of the research on what I have been calling collaborative learning has used the term
cooperative learning. Although some view cooperative learning to refer only to some formats for learning
in groups, I will use the term collaborative learning because it has a stronger connotation of students
constructing new ideas together.
COLLABORATIVE LEARNING: GOALS, OBSTACLES,
AND PRODUCTIVE PROCESSES
In this section, we will examine the central goals of collaborative lerning as well as some obstacles
that can get in the way of achieving these goals. Then we will examine seven productive collaborative
group processes that can help groups achieve the goals of collaborative learning while sidestepping the
obstacles. Figure 15.1 summarizes the goals, the obstacles, and the processes.
Figure 15.1: Promoting the goals of collaborative learning through effective instructional
methods
This figure illustrates that the instructional methods that we will examine in this chapter promote
the core learning processes, which in turn promote the attainment of the goals of collaborative
learning. These methods also discourage processes that are obstacles to effective collaborative
groups.
Instructional methods for
promoting effective group
processes
Reward structures
Guided cooperation
Complex tasks
Scaffolding
Preteaching knowledge,
strategies
Task decomposition
Cognitive prompts
Social and cognitive roles
Hints
Self-evaluation
Fading scaffolding
Preparing students for group
work
Reducing status differences
What teachers do during group
collaboration
Group size and composition
promote
discourage
Core processes of
effective collaborative
groups
Engagement
Positive
interdependence
Mutual respect
Balanced interactions
High-quality strategy
use
Uptake of ideas
Goals of collaborative
learning
Learning
Teamwork skills
Liking diverse peers
Prosocial attitudes
and behavior
Reduce differences in
social status
promote
Obstacles to effective collaborative groups
Off-task behavior Negative interactions
Social loafing No interactions
Unequal interaction Low-quality interactions
Exacerbation of status
differences