Basic Engineering Mathematics, Fifth Edition

(Amelia) #1

Chapter 18


Graphs reducing non-linear


laws to linear form


18.1 Introduction


In Chapter 17 we discovered that the equation of a
straight line graph is of the formy=mx+c,where
mis the gradient andcis they-axis intercept. This
chapterexplainshowthelawofagraphcanstillbedeter-
mined even when it is not of thelinear formy=mx+c.
The method used is calleddetermination of lawand is
explained in the following sections.


18.2 Determination of law


Frequently, the relationship between two variables, say
xandy, is nota linear one;i.e., whenxis plottedagainst
ya curve results. In such cases the non-linear equation
may be modified to the linear form,y=mx+c,sothat
theconstants,and thus thelaw relating thevariables,can
be determined. This technique is called ‘determination
of law’.
Some examples of the reduction of equations to linear
form include


(i) y=ax^2 +bcompares withY=mX+c,where
m=a,c=bandX=x^2.
Hence,yis plotted vertically againstx^2 horizon-
tally to produce a straight line graph of gradient
aandy-axis interceptb.

(ii) y=

a
x

+b,i.e.y=a

(
1
x

)
+b

yis plotted vertically against

1
x

horizontally to
produce a straight line graph of gradientaand
y-axis interceptb.

(iii) y=ax^2 +bx
Dividing both sides byxgives

y
x

=ax+b.

Comparing withY=mX+cshows that

y
x

is
plotted vertically againstxhorizontally to pro-
duce a straight line graph of gradientaand

y
x
axis interceptb.
Here are some worked problems to demonstrate deter-
mination of law.

Problem 1. Experimental values ofxandy,
shown below, are believed to be related by the law
y=ax^2 +b. By plotting a suitable graph, verify
this law and determine approximate values of
aandb

x 1 2 3 4 5

y 9. 8 15. 2 24. 2 36. 5 53. 0

Ifyis plotted againstxa curve results and it is not
possible to determine the values of constantsaandb
from the curve.
Comparingy=ax^2 +bwithY=mX+cshows that
yis to be plotted vertically againstx^2 horizontally. A
table of values is drawn up as shown below.

x 1 2 3 4 5
x^21491625

y 9. 8 15. 2 24. 2 36. 5 53. 0

DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-85617-697-2.00018-1

Free download pdf