Table 20.2
(continued)
Meadows et al (1972)
Mesarovic and Pestel (1974)
Kahn, Brown and Martel (1976)
Goldsmith et al (1972)
LAWM
a^
Herrera et al (1976)
Leontief, Carter and Petri (1977)
USCEQ
b^
(1980)
Clark and Munn (1986)
Brown(1981)
Economic system and exchange
No-growth; services; human needs; planning implied; resource efficiency; balance of consumption/population; surplus for arts and leisure
Organic model; cooperation; planning implied; restrained growth in North
Growth for South to catch up; North model as universal; tech-nology, institutional, morale as key; eventual slowing of demand
Steady state; stock not flow resource efficiency; minimal disruption; local control; small scale; correspon-dence of economic/real costs/values
Scarcity = technopolity; human needs; socialist redistribution; social determi-nation of needs; planning; eventual slowing of growth; growth not answer
Develop under-used resources; NIEO
c to close
North–South gap; self-reliance; pollution abatement
Decelerating growth
More of the same
Steady state; intragenera-tional welfare; durability; high-tech, high design; resource efficiency; conserva-tion; labour-intensive; generaliza-tion
Techno-logy
Not cause or solution; useful technofaith as diversion; shape by social need/priority
Not cause or solution; useful; restrain by social concerns
Good to control nature; main human resource; Faustian bargain
Incompatible with stability; anti-ecological – simplifies complexity; hubris; increases vulnerability; should serve decentraliza-tion
Avert scarcity; prevent pollution; social control; progress essential
Narrow North–South gap; expand resource exploitation; pollution abatement
Solution available but politically constrained
Brings environ-mental changes, good and bad
Decentra-lized; soft-path renewables