Table 20.2
(continued)
Meadows et al (1972)Mesarovic and Pestel (1974)Kahn, Brown and Martel (1976)Goldsmith et al (1972)LAWMa^Herrera et al (1976)Leontief, Carter and Petri (1977)USCEQb^(1980)Clark and Munn (1986)Brown(1981)Economic system and exchangeNo-growth; services; human needs; planning implied; resource efficiency; balance of consumption/population; surplus for arts and leisureOrganic model; cooperation; planning implied; restrained growth in NorthGrowth for South to catch up; North model as universal; tech-nology, institutional, morale as key; eventual slowing of demandSteady state; stock not flow resource efficiency; minimal disruption; local control; small scale; correspon-dence of economic/real costs/valuesScarcity = technopolity; human needs; socialist redistribution; social determi-nation of needs; planning; eventual slowing of growth; growth not answerDevelop under-used resources; NIEOc to close
North–South gap; self-reliance; pollution abatementDecelerating growthMore of the sameSteady state; intragenera-tional welfare; durability; high-tech, high design; resource efficiency; conserva-tion; labour-intensive; generaliza-tionTechno-logyNot cause or solution; useful technofaith as diversion; shape by social need/priorityNot cause or solution; useful; restrain by social concernsGood to control nature; main human resource; Faustian bargainIncompatible with stability; anti-ecological – simplifies complexity; hubris; increases vulnerability; should serve decentraliza-tionAvert scarcity; prevent pollution; social control; progress essentialNarrow North–South gap; expand resource exploitation; pollution abatementSolution available but politically constrainedBrings environ-mental changes, good and badDecentra-lized; soft-path renewables