Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High

(ff) #1
172 CRUCIAL CONVERSATIONS

see every problem as a nail." Consensus decision making is
one of today's widely used hammers. People apply it to situa­
tions that don't deserve the time and attention needed to come
to a consensus or that can't be solved unanimously.
For example, forty people are brought together to decide on
the color of the work area. That's too many people. Use con­
sultation. A team meets to decide if each team member should
use a certain type of coffee mug (we're not making this up).
Let people choose their own. A couple asks their son to decide
his own punishment. Not always a good idea. Some decisions
need to be made by command.


  • Don't pretend that everyone gets his or her first choice. Nobody
    ever said that with consensus everyone gets his or her way.
    Consensus isn't about getting your way; it's about doing what's
    best for the family or team. It requires give and take. It demands
    compromise followed by the resolve to support (in some cases)
    your second or third choice-because it's best for the group.

  • No martyrs please. Healthy teams and families are good at
    coming to consensus because they're good at dialogue. They
    don't toggle from silence to violence or otherwise play games
    in order to get their way. Since everyone has a say and says it
    well, healthy groups don't end up with the same people con­
    stantly giving in and then playing the role of martyr. "Are you
    enjoying the theme park? Don't worry about me. I'll just sit
    here on the curb and try to think of what it would have been
    like to go to Paris."

  • Don't take turns. Decisions should be based on merit, not on
    who offers up the options. Don't take turns getting your way.
    "Well, Leona, my recollection is that you gave in last time, so
    I guess it's our turn to roll over on this one." Make the deci­
    sion based on which proposal best meets the needs of the

Free download pdf