this    were    a   different   kind    of  book,   I   would.
Though  many    of  the preceding   chapters    have    been    devoted to  the
extinction  (or near-extinction)    of  individual  organisms—the   Panamanian
golden  frog,   the great   auk,    the Sumatran    rhino—my    real    subject has been
the pattern they    participate in. What    I’ve    been    trying  to  do  is  trace   an
extinction  event—call  it  the Holocene    extinction, or  the Anthropocene
extinction, or, if  you prefer  the sound   of  it, the Sixth   Extinction—and  to
place   this    event   in  the broader context of  life’s  history.    That    history is
neither strictly    uniformitarian  nor catastrophist;  rather, it  is  a   hybrid  of
the two.    What    this    history reveals,    in  its ups and its downs,  is  that    life    is
extremely    resilient   but     not     infinitely  so.     There   have    been    very    long
uneventful   stretches   and     very,   very    occasionally    “revolutions    on  the
surface of  the earth.”
To  the extent  that    we  can identify    the causes  of  these   revolutions,
they’re  highly  varied:     glaciation  in  the     case    of  the     end-Ordovician
extinction, global  warming and changes in  ocean   chemistry   at  the end of
the Permian,    an  asteroid    impact  in  the final   seconds of  the Cretaceous.
The  current     extinction  has     its     own     novel   cause:  not     an  asteroid    or  a
massive volcanic    eruption    but “one    weedy   species.”   As  Walter  Alvarez
put it  to  me, “We’re  seeing  right   now that    a   mass    extinction  can be  caused
by  human   beings.”
The one feature these   disparate   events  have    in  common  is  change  and,
to  be  more    specific,   rate    of  change. When    the world   changes faster  than
species can adapt,  many    fall    out.    This    is  the case    whether the agent   drops
from    the sky in  a   fiery   streak  or  drives  to  work    in  a   Honda.  To  argue   that
the current extinction  event   could   be  averted if  people  just    cared   more
and were    willing to  make    more    sacrifices  is  not wrong,  exactly;    still,  it
misses  the point.  It  doesn’t much    matter  whether people  care    or  don’t
care.   What    matters is  that    people  change  the world.
This    capacity    predates    modernity,  though, of  course, modernity   is  its
fullest  expression.     Indeed,     this    capacity    is  probably    indistinguishable
from    the qualities   that    made    us  human   to  begin   with:   our restlessness,
                    
                      tuis.
                      (Tuis.)
                      
                    
                #1