Sagan   decided to  try to  model   the effects of  an  all-out war and came    up
with    the concept of  “nuclear    winter,”    which,  in  turn,   generated   its own
wave    of  media   coverage.
But  among   professional    paleontologists,    the     Alvarezes’  idea    and     in
many    cases   the Alvarezes   themselves  were    reviled.    “The    apparent    mass
extinction   is  an  artifact    of  statistics  and     poor    understanding   of  the
taxonomy,”  one paleontologist  told    the New York    Times.
“The    arrogance   of  those   people  is  unbelievable,”  a   second  asserted.
“They   know    next    to  nothing about   how real    animals evolve, live,   and
become  extinct.    But despite their   ignorance,  the geochemists feel    that    all
you have    to  do  is  crank   up  some    fancy   machine and you’ve  revolutionized
science.”
“Unseen bolides dropping    into    an  unseen  sea are not for me,”    a   third
declared.
“The    Cretaceous  extinctions were    gradual and the catastrophe theory
is  wrong,” yet another paleontologist  stated. But “simplistic theories    will
continue    to  come    along   to  seduce  a   few scientists  and enliven the covers
of   popular     magazines.”     Curiously   enough,     the    Times’   editorial   board
decided  to  weigh   in  on  the     matter.     “Astronomers    should  leave   to
astrologers the task    of  seeking the cause   of  earthly events  in  the stars,”
the paper   admonished.
To  understand  the vehemence   of  this    reaction,   it  helps   to  go  back,
once    again,  to  Lyell.  In  the fossil  record, mass    extinctions stand   out,    so
much    so  that    the very    language    that’s  used    to  describe    earth’s history is
derived from    them.   In  1841,   John    Phillips,   a   contemporary    of  Lyell’s who
succeeded   him as  president   of  the Geological  Society of  London, divided
life    into    three   chapters.   He  called  the first   the Paleozoic,  from    the Greek
for “ancient    life,”  the second  the Mesozoic,   meaning “middle life,”  and the
third   the Cenozoic,   “new    life.”  Phillips    fixed   as  the dividing    point   between
the  Paleozoic   and     the     Mesozoic    what    would   now     be  called  the     end-
Permian extinction, and between the Mesozoic    and the Cenozoic,   the end-
Cretaceous   event.  (In     geologic    parlance,   the     Paleozoic,  Mesozoic,   and
                    
                      tuis.
                      (Tuis.)
                      
                    
                #1