Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology

(Steven Felgate) #1

  1. T Murata, T Akazawa. Enzymatic mechanism of starch synthesis in sweet potato root. I. Rquirement of potas-
    sium ions for starch synthetase. Arch Biochem Biophys 126:873–879, 1968.

  2. J Willenbrink, S Doll, HP Getz, S Meyer. Zuckeraufnahme in isolierten vakuolen und protoplasten aus dem
    speichergewebe von beta-ruben. Ber Dtsch Bot Ges 97:27–39, 1984.

  3. G Hanson, A Kylin. ATP-ase activities in homogenates from sugar-beet roots, relation to Mgand (Na
    K)-stimulation. Z Pflanzenphysiol 60:270–275, 1969.

  4. AL Green, CB Taylor. Kinetics of (NaK) stimulated adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) of rabbit kidney mi-
    crosome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 14:118–123, 1964.

  5. A Kylin, G Hansson. Transport of sodium and potassium and properties of (sodium potassium) activated
    adenosine triphosphatase: possible connection with salt tolerance in plants. Eighth Coll. Int. Potash Institute,
    Berlin, 1971, pp 64–68.

  6. G Hanson. Patterns of ionic influences on sugar beet ATPases. PhD dissertation, University of Stockholm,
    Stockholm, 1975.

  7. BH Shah, RT Wedding. Sodium ion influence on phosphorylations associated with oxidation of succinate by
    turnip root mitochondria. Science 160:304–306, 1968.

  8. O Lamm, H Malmgren. Measurements of the degree of dispersion of a highly polymerized metaphosphate pre-
    pared according to Tammann. Z Anorg Allg Chem 245:103–120, 1940.

  9. AJ Hiatt, HJ Evans. Influence of certain cations on activity of acetic thiokinase from spinach leaves. Plant
    Physiol 35:673–677, 1960.

  10. V Rocha, IP Ting. Tissue distribution of microbody, mitochondrial, and soluble malate dehydrogenase isoen-
    zymes. Plant Physiol 46:754–756, 1970.

  11. Y Tanaka, T Ito, T Akazawa. Enzymatic mechanism of starch breakdown in germinating rice seed. III. -Amy-
    lase isoenzymes. Plant Physiol 46:650–654, 1970.

  12. MC Williams. Effect of sodium and potassium salts on growth and oxalate content of halogeton. Plant Physiol
    35:500–509, 1960.

  13. LO Hylton, A Ulrich, DR Cornelius. Potassium and sodium interrelations in growth and mineral content of Ital-
    ian ryegrass. Agron J 59:311–314, 1967.

  14. AM El-Sheikh, A Ulrich, TC Broyer. Sodium and rubidium as possible nutrients for sugar beet plants. Plant
    Physiol 42:1202–1208, 1967.

  15. AP Draycott, MJ Durrant. Response by sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers, particularly in relation
    to soils containing little exchangeable potassium. J Agric Sci (Camb) 87:105–112, 1976.

  16. JJ Lehr, JM Wybenga. Exploratory pot experiments on sensitiveness of different crops to sodium. Plant Soil
    3:251–261, 1955.

  17. PBH Tinker. The effects of nitrogen, potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet. J Agric Sci (Camb) 65:
    207–212, 1965.

  18. WD Jeschke. K-Naexchange and selectivity in barley root cells: effect of Naon the Nafluxes. J Exp Bot
    28:1289–1305, 1977.

  19. WD Jeschke. K-Naselectivity in roots, localisation of selective fluxes and their regulation. In: E Marre, O
    Ciferri, eds. Regulation of Cell Membrane Activities in Plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977, pp 63–78.

  20. MA Nunes, MA Dias, M Correia, MM Oliveira. Further studies on growth and osmoregulation of sugarbeet
    leaves under low salinity conditions. J Exp Bot 35:322–331, 1984.

  21. GFJ Milford, WF Cormack, MJ Durrant. Effects of sodium chloride on water status and growth of sugar beet.
    J Exp Bot 28:1380–1388, 1977.

  22. NH Peck, JP VanBuren, GE MacDonald, M Hemmat, RF Becker. Table beet plant and canned root responses
    to Na, K, and Cl from soils and from applications of NaCl and KCl. J Am Soc Horiet Sci 112:188–194, 1987.

  23. AP Draycott, JAP Marsh, PBH Tinker. Sodium and potassium relationships in sugar beet. J Agric Sci (Camb)
    74:568–573, 1970.

  24. G Judel, H Kuhn. Uber die wirkung einer natriumdungung zu zuckerruben bei guter versogung mit kalium in
    gefabversuchen. Zucker 28:68–71, 1975.

  25. MJ Durrant, AP Draycott, GFJ Milford. Effect of sodium fertilizer on water status and yield of sugar beet. Ann
    Appl Biol 88:321–328, 1978.

  26. AP Draycott, SM Bugg. Response by sugarbeet to various amounts and times of application of sodium chlo-
    ride fertilizer in relation to soil type. J Agric Sci 98:579–592, 1982.

  27. JT Wooley. Sodium and silicon as nutrients for the tomato plant. Plant Physiol 32:317–321, 1957.

  28. A Pardossi, G Bagnoli, F Malorgio, CA Campiotti, F Tognoni. NaCl effects on celery (Apium graveolensL.)
    grown in NFT. Sci Hortic 81:229–242, 1999.

  29. PM Harmer, EJ Benne, WM Laughlin, C Key. Factors affecting crop response to sodium applied as a common
    salt on Michigan muck soil. Soil Sci 76:1–17, 1953.

  30. H Marschner, A Kylin, PJC Kuiper. Differences in salt tolerance of three sugar beet genotypes. Physiol Plant
    51:234–238, 1981.

  31. H Marschner, PJC Kuiper, A Kylin. Genotypic differences in the response of sugar beet plants to replacement
    of potassium by sodium. Physiol Plant 51:239–244, 1981.

  32. PM Harmer. Muck soil management for sugar beet production. Mich Agric Exp Stn Cir Bull 187, 1943.


SODIUM—A FUNCTIONAL NUTRIENT IN PLANTS 383

Free download pdf