Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology

(Steven Felgate) #1

  1. RC Nageswara Rao, JH Williams, KDR Wadia, KT Hubick, GD Farquhar. Crop growth, water-use efficiency
    and carbon isotope discrimination in groundnut (Arachis hypogaeaL.) genotypes under end-of-season drought
    conditions. Ann Appl Biol 122:357–367, 1993.

  2. WSF Schuster, SL Philips, DR Sandquist, JR Ehleringer. Heritability of carbon isotope discrimination in
    Qutierrezia microcephala(Asteraceae). Am J Bot 79:216–221, 1992.

  3. GC Wright, TA Sarwanto, A Rahmianna, D Syarefuddin. Investigation of drought tolerance traits conferring
    adaptation to drought stress in peanut. In: GC Wright, KJ Middleton, eds. Peanut Improvement: A Case Study
    in Indonesia. ACIAR Proceedings No. 40, Canberra, Australia, 1993, pp 74–84.

  4. FC Meinzer, G Goldstein, DA Grantz. Carbon isotope discrimination in coffee genotypes grown under limited
    water supply. Plant Physiol 92:130–135, 1990.

  5. JM Virgona, KT Hubick, HM Rawson, GD Farquhar, RW Downes. Genotypic variation in transpiration effi-
    ciency, carbon isotope discrimination and carbon allocation during early growth in sunflower. Aust J Plant
    Physiol 17:207–214, 1990.

  6. RC Nageswara Rao, GC Wright. Stability of the relationship between specific leaf area and carbon isotope dis-
    crimination across environments in peanut. Crop Sci 34:98–103, 1994.

  7. RD Guy, PG Warne, DM Reid. Stable carbon isotope ratio as an index of water-use efficiency in C 3 halo-
    phytes—possible relationship to strategies for osmotic adjustment. In: PW Rundel, JR Ehleringer, KA Nagy,
    eds. Ecological Studies—68, Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp 55–75.

  8. KJ McCree, SG Richardson. Salt increases the water use efficiency in water stressed plants. Crop Sci
    27:543–547, 1987.

  9. GD Farquhar, TD Sharkey. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33:317–345,



  10. IR Cowan. Regulation of water use in relation to carbon gain in higher plants. In: OL Lange, PS Nobel, CB Os-
    mond, H Ziegler, eds. Physiological Plant Ecology. II. Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Ency-
    clopaedia of Plant Physiology. New Series. Vol 12B. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982, pp 589–613.

  11. DA Johnson, KH Assay, LL Tieszen, JR Ehleringer, PG Jefferson. Carbon isotope discrimination: potential in
    screening cool-season grasses for water limited environments. Crop Sci 30:338–343, 1990.

  12. K Winter. CO 2 and water vapour exchange, malate content, and ^13 C value in Cicer arietenumgrown under
    two water regimes. Z Pflanzenphysiol 101:421–430, 1981.

  13. KT Hubick, GD Farquhar. Carbon isotope discrimination—selecting for water-use efficiency. Aust Cotton
    Grower 8:66–68, 1987.

  14. JR Ehleringer. Correlations between carbon isotope ratio, water use efficiency and yield. In: JW White, G
    Hoogenboom, F Ibarra, SP Singh, eds. Research on Drought Tolerance in Common Bean. Working document
    no 41. Cali: CIAT, 1988, pp 165–191.

  15. JR Ehleringer, TA Cooper. Correlations between isotope ratio and microhabitat in desert plants. Oecologia
    76:562–566, 1988.

  16. AE Hall, RG Mutters, KT Hubick, GD Farquhar. Genotypic differences in carbon isotope discrimination by
    cowpea under wet and dry field conditions. Crop Sci 30:300–305, 1990.

  17. AE Hall, RG Mutters, GD Farquhar. Genotypic and drought induced differences in carbon isotope discrimina-
    tion and gas exchange of cowpea. Crop Sci 32:1–6, 1992.

  18. WR Kirchhoff, AE Hall, WW Thomson. Gas exchange, carbon isotope discrimination, and chloroplast ultra-
    structure of a chlorophyll deficient mutant of cowpea. Crop Sci 29:109–115, 1989.

  19. IR Cowan. Stomatal physiology and gas exchange in the field. In: O.T. Denmead, ed. Flow and Transport in
    the Natural Environment: Advances and Applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988, pp 160–172.

  20. CB Osmond, K Winter, H Ziegler. Functional significance of different pathways of CO 2 in photosynthesis. In:
    OL Lange, PS Nobel, CB Osmond, H Ziegler, eds. Physiological Plant Ecology II, Water Relations and Car-
    bon Assimilation. Encyclopaedia of Plant Physiology. New Series. Vol 12B. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982, pp
    479–547.

  21. SC Wong, IR Cowan, GD Farquhar. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature
    282:424–426, 1979.

  22. TA Howell. Relationships between crop production and transpiration, evapotranspiration and irrigation. In: BA
    Stewart, DR Nielson, eds. Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy,
    1990, pp 391–434.

  23. J Goudriaan, HH van Laar. Relations between leaf resistance, CO 2 concentration and K assimilation in maize,
    beans, lanlang grass and sunflower. Photosynthetica 12:241–249, 1978.

  24. DR Krieg. Whole-plant response to water deficits: carbon assimilation and utilization. In: HM Taylor, WR Jor-
    dan, TR Sinclair, eds. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. Madison, WI: American Society
    of Agronomy, 1983, pp 319–330.

  25. RA Fischer, D Rees, KD Sayre, ZM Lu, AG Condon, A Larque Saavedra. Wheat yield progress associated with
    higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Sci 38:1467–1475, 1998.

  26. C Ramos, AE Hall. Relationships between leaf conductance, intercellular CO 2 uptake rate in two C 3 and C 4
    plant species. Photosynthetica 16:343–355, 1982.

  27. MH O’Leary, I Treichel, M Rooney. Short term measurement of carbon isotope fractionation in plants. Plant
    Physiol 80:578–582, 1986.


TRANSPIRATION EFFICIENCY AND GENETIC IMPROVEMENT 853

Free download pdf