Handbook of Plant and Crop Physiology

(Steven Felgate) #1

have 4–6 hr in darkness during a 24-hr cycle. Also, for any given daily integrated PPF, a lower average
instantaneous PPF is preferable to decrease the crop’s light compensation point. The combination of a
longer photoperiod and a lower average instantaneous PPF, for any given daily integrated PPF, consti-
tutes the ideal scenario for lowering maintenance respiration and improving the crop’s growth or yield.
Because proper design of a composite lighting profile could result in significant crop growth for a
given total integrated PPF, an important implication of composite lighting is that it could potentially cut
down significantly the electrical power required to achieve a given desired level of crop biomass. It is en-
tirely probable that employing an appropriate composite lighting profile could obviate the delivery of ad-
ditional moles of photons to a given crop to increase its growth or yield because composite lighting, rel-
ative to certain conventional lighting profiles, could increase crop growth or yield without increasing the
total integrated PPF. The capacity of composite lighting to conserve electrical power by its ability to op-
timize crop yield requires further investigation. Its benefits would be of significant importance not only
in terrestrial greenhouse and growth-chamber applications but also in extraterrestrial advanced life sup-
port systems for the human exploration and development of space.


REFERENCES



  1. GT Bruggink, E Heuvelink. Influence of light on growth of young tomato, cucumber, and sweet pepper plants
    in the greenhouse: effects on relative growth rate, net assimilation rate and leaf area ratio. Sci Hortic
    31:161–174, 1987.

  2. HR Gislerod, IM Eidstein, LM Mortensen. The interaction of daily lighting period and light intensity on growth
    of some greenhouse plants. Sci Hortic 38:295–304, 1989.

  3. LM Mortensen, HR Gislerod, H Mikkelsen. Maximizing the yield of greenhouse roses with respect to artificial
    lighting. Norw J Agric Sci 6:27–34, 1992.

  4. JL Cuello, D Jack, P Sadler, T Nakamura. Hybrid solar and artificial lighting (HYSAL): next-generation light-
    ing strategy for bioregenerative advanced life support. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on En-
    vironmental Systems, Denver, 1999.

  5. JL Cuello, Y Yang, E Ono, K Jordan, T Nakamura. Hybrid solar and xenon–metal halide lighting for lunar and
    martian bioregenerative life support. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Environmental Sys-
    tems, Toulouse, 2000.

  6. JL Cuello, D Jack, E Ono, T Nakamura. Supplemental terrestrial solar lighting for an experimental subterranean
    biomass production chamber. Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Environmental Systems,
    Toulouse, 2000.

  7. FWT Penning de Vries. Substrate utilization and respiration in relation to growth and maintenance of higher
    plants. Neth J Agric Sci 22:40 – 4 4, 1974.

  8. FWT Penning de Vries. The cost of maintenance processes in plant cells. Ann Bot 39:77–92, 1975.

  9. D Wilson. Variation in leaf respiration in relation to growth and photosynthesis in Lolium. Ann Appl Biol
    80:323–338, 1975.

  10. JE Sheehy, JM Cobby, GJA Ryle. The growth of perennial rye grass: a model. Ann Bot 43:335–354, 1979.

  11. JE Sheehy, JM Cobby, GJA Ryle. The use of a model to investigate the influence of some environmental fac-
    tors on the growth of perennial rye grass. Ann Bot 46:343–365, 1980.

  12. GH Heichel. Confirming measurements of respiration and photosynthesis with dry matter accumulation. Photo-
    synthetica 5:93–98, 1971.

  13. JJ Volenec, CJ Nelson, DA Sleper. Influence of temperature on leaf dark respiration of diverse tall fescue geno-
    types. Crop Sci 24:907–912, 1984.

  14. M Winzeler, DE McCullough, LA Hunt. Genotypic differences in dark respiration of mature leaves in winter
    wheat (Triticum aestivumL.). Can J Plant Sci 68:669–675, 1988.

  15. D Wilson, JG Jones. Effect of selection for dark respiration rate of mature leaves on crop yields of Lolium
    perennecv. S23. Ann Bot 49:313–320, 1982.

  16. JS Amthor. Respiration and Crop Productivity. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp 164–169.

  17. S Logendra, HW Janes. Light duration effects on carbon partitioning and translocation in tomato. Sci Hortic
    52:19–25, 1992.

  18. NJ Chatterton, JE Silvius. Photosynthate partitioning into starch in soybean leaves. 1. Effects of photoperiod
    versus photosynthetic period duration. Plant Physiol 64:749–753, 1979.

  19. NJ Chatterton, JE Silvius. Acclimation of photosynthate partitioning and photosynthetic rates to changes in
    length of the daily photosynthetic period. Ann Bot 46:739–745, 1980.

  20. RC Sicher, WG Harris, DF Kremer, NJ Chatterton. Effects of shortened daylength upon translocation and starch
    accumulation by maize, wheat, and pangola grass leaves. Can J Bot 60:1304 – 1309, 1982.

  21. JM Robinson. Photosynthetic carbon metabolism in leaves and isolated chloroplasts from spinach plants grown
    under short and intermediate photosynthetic periods. Plant Physiol 75:397– 4 09, 1984.


COMPOSITE LIGHTING FOR PLANT FACTORIES 923

Free download pdf