328 Methods of Proof
(
1 +
1
n
)n
< 3 ,
while the inequality on the right can be reduced to
(
1 +
1
n
)n
> 2.
These are both true for alln≥1 because the sequence( 1 +^1 n)nis increasing and converges
toe, which is less than 3. Hence the conclusion.
16.The left-hand side grows withn, while the right-hand side stays constant, so apparently
a proof by induction would fail. It works, however, if we sharpen the inequality to
1 +
1
23
+
1
33
+···+
1
n^3
<
3
2
−
1
n
,n≥ 2.
As such, the casesn=1 andn=2 need to be treated separately, and they are easy to
check.
The base case is forn=3: 1+ 213 + 313 < 1 +^18 + 271 <^32 −^13. For the inductive
step, note that from
1 +
1
23
+
1
33
+···+
1
n^3
<
3
2
−
1
n
, for somen≥ 3 ,
we obtain
1 +
1
23
+
1
33
+···+
1
n^3
+
1
(n+ 1 )^3
<
3
2
−
1
n
+
1
(n+ 1 )^3
.
All we need to check is
3
2
−
1
n
+
1
(n+ 1 )^3
<
3
2
−
1
(n+ 1 )
,
which is equivalent to
1
(n+ 1 )^3
<
1
n
−
1
(n+ 1 )
,
or
1
(n+ 1 )^3
<
1
n(n+ 1 )
.
This is true, completing the inductive step. This proves the inequality.