SN 7.10.2021

(J-Ad) #1

The Sun and News


Your Hometown Newspaper Serving Middleville and Caledonia Areas


No. 28/July 10, 2021 Published by J-Ad Graphics, Inc. • 1351 N. M-43 Highway, Hastings, MI 49058 143rd year


Caledonia Twp. approves tax


break for Aspen Surgical


Twenty new


jobs expected
Greg Chandler
Staff Writer
A surgical products manu-
facturer based in Caledonia
Township plans to add at
least 20 new jobs in the next
two years as a result of con-
struction of a new
70,000-square-foot building
in the Southbelt Industrial
Park.
The township board
Wednesday unanimously
approved a 10-year, 50 per-
cent industrial facilities tax
abatement for Aspen Surgical
Products Inc. on the nearly
$6.2 million project, current-
ly under construction at 5145
Beltway Drive SE.
Founded in Caledonia
Township in 1999, Aspen
Surgical produces both
branded and private-label
disposable surgical products,
including scalpels, blades,
needle guides, surgical mark-
ing pens and basic wound-
care products. The company
currently employs about 240
workers locally, Jeff Stephen,
vice president for operations,
said.
“The primary driver was
office space, as well as
expanding our distribution
operations,” Stephen told the
board during a public hearing
prior to approval of the tax
break.
About 25,000-30,
square feet of the facility is
planned for distribution
expansion, with another
14,000 square feet to be used
for office space, Stephen
said.
“The remainder is [for]

growth for the business,
whether that’s growing for
distribution, whether we
grow in bringing more prod-
ucts in to produce, or wheth-
er we grow in office space,”
he said.
The new facility will con-
nect to a nearby manufactur-
ing facility on Southbelt
Drive, Stephen said.
Aspen Surgical was spun
off two years ago by its pre-
vious owners, Hill-Rom
Holdings, in a $170 million
deal with Audax Private
Equity.
“In the period since the
spinoff in August 2019,
we’ve acquired five compa-
nies ... with a big focus on
consolidation,” Stephen said.
“We’re consolidating those
individual facilities, whether
it’s the distribution of those
products, the manufacture of
those products, or both, into
one of our existing North
American facilities.”
Aspen Surgical’s most
recent acquisition occurred
last month, when the compa-
ny acquired Stork, a division
of Briggs Healthcare, which

produces sterile disposable
obstetrics products.
Under Public Act 198, the
Michigan law that allows
local governmental units the
ability to grant tax breaks for
new or expanding manufac-
turing facilities, a municipal-
ity can grant a 50 percent
abatement on property taxes
for the building, machinery
and equipment for up to 12
years. Aspen Surgical asked
for a 12-year exemption, but
Clerk Joni Henry said the
township’s legal counsel
advised a 10-year exemption
instead.
“That’s what we have done
in the past,” Henry said. “Our
attorney said it would be in
our best interests to continue
with the precedent we have
already set.”
In addition to the facility
in Caledonia Township,
Aspen Surgical also has man-
ufacturing operations in
Puerto Rico and Mexico.
In other business, the
township board approved:


  • A 2.5 percent midyear


IN THIS ISSUE...



  • Barry County Sheriff discussed
    seizing voting machines

  • Runners together again at
    2021 Kilt Klassic

  • Middleville to begin flushing hydrants

  • Middleville planners recommend
    approval of marijuana ordinance


68th Street construction


to get underway next week


Greg Chandler
Staff Writer
A $1.65 million project to
rebuild 68th Street, between
Cherry Valley Avenue and
Thornapple River Drive in
Caledonia Township, will get
underway Monday after the
project was delayed a week
by area flooding.
The project was scheduled
to get underway July 5, but
was put on hold because of
emergency repair work on


Thornapple River Drive,
between 60th and 68th
streets, where heavy rains
June 24 through 26 caused
flooding leading to erosion
of the bank and roadbed,
according to the Kent County
Road Commission.
The 68th Street project
involves reconstruction of
the road to a two-lane all-sea-
son road standard. The proj-
ect includes earthwork,
ditches, culvert replacement

and paving, including the
addition of a paved shoulder,
according to the road com-
mission.
The project is slated for
completion Oct. 1. During
construction, traffic will be
detoured to 84th Street
between M-37 and
Whitneyville Road, Road
Commission spokeswoman
Maura Lamoreaux said.
Kentwood Excavating is
the contractor for the project.

Dispute continues over illegal towers in Caledonia Township


Greg Chandler
Staff Writer
An ongoing legal dispute
between Caledonia Township
and a telecommunications
company appears no closer
to being resolved. The com-
pany, Michwave
Technologies Inc., erected
four communications towers
without getting prior approv-
al from the township.
Township Supervisor
Bryan Harrison and
Treasurer/Administrator
Richard Robertson updated
their board colleagues
Wednesday night on the dis-
pute between the township
and Michwave. The town-
ship earlier this spring issued
19 civil infraction complaints
against the company over the
towers – located at 6203
Whitneyville Ave., 7225
Snow Ave., 9281 84th St.
and 8450 96th St.


Township officials say
Michwave erected the towers
without getting prior approv-
al for special land use
through the planning com-
mission, which is required
under the township ordi-
nance. At previous township
board meetings over the past
couple of years, Michwave
representatives said the tow-
ers were needed to address a
lack of internet service in the
Caledonia area.
“While we certainly rec-
ognize the need, the practice
was undertaken without pull-
ing permits, and [without]
also being able to show, once
it came to our attention, to
show that they were built to
building requirements – to
state requirements and our
[township] construction
requirements,” Harrison
said.
Among the violations

cited in the township’s com-
plaint are a lack of evidence
that the towers have a proper
cement foundation, as well
as violation of a setback that
requires a tower to be at least
the same number of feet
away from the property line
as the height of the tower –
for example, a 100-foot-high
tower would need to be at
least 100 feet away from a
property line.
The township asked the
contractor to certify that the
towers were installed proper-

ly. Harrison said the contrac-
tor refused, saying he would
rather remove the towers
than comply.
“If he was doing [installa-
tion] under the legal and
authorized process, it would
be a matter of course, similar
to you building a garage or
any other structure under
code,” he said.
The township retained
Soils and Structures, an engi-
neering and consulting firm
based in Norton Shores, to
evaluate the foundations of

each of the four tower sites.
“Not to any surprise on
our part, [the evaluation]
confirmed that the founda-
tions do not meet the manu-
facturer’s recommendation.
In fact, they don’t even come
close,” Robertson said. “For
an example, that foundation
should be 32 inches into the
ground, and one of them was
16 inches into the ground. It
wasn’t that they barely didn’t
make it. They didn’t come
close to making it.”
The Kent County Circuit
Court could direct Michwave
to take down the towers, but
no decision has been made. A
court hearing in the case was
to have been held next week,
but that has been postponed,
Robertson said.
“We have not been sued.
We’re not in the process of a
lawsuit. We haven’t been
served. We haven’t served

[Michwave]. We’ve simply
cited the tower contractor on
a number of violations, both
the safety violations ... as
well as a failure to get the
special land-use approval
from the planning commis-
sion,” Robertson said.
Township Trustee Tim
Bradshaw expressed unease
about the safety of those who
live in the area of the towers.
“My concern is what lia-
bility do we have, now that
we know more about the
foundation?” Bradshaw
asked. “I think we want to
act quickly [to remove the
towers], knowing that I think
they are unsafe structures. [I
want to make sure] the pub-
lic is protected.”
Robertson doubted wheth-
er the township could be held
liable for any future damag-

“Not to any surprise on our part, [the evaluation] con-
firmed that the foundations do not meet the manu-
facturer’s recommendation. In fact, they don’t even
come close. For an example, that foundation should
be 32 inches into the ground, and one of them was
16 inches into the ground. It wasn’t that they barely
didn’t make it. They didn’t come close to making it.”
Treasurer/Administrator Richard Robertson

See TOWERS, page 11

See TAX BREAK, page 11

Middleville considers


eliminating rental fees


for nonprofits, others
Greg Chandler
Staff Writer
Nonprofit organizations,
religious groups and schools
would not have to pay a fee
to reserve a Middleville
park facility under a pro-
posed change being consid-
ered by village leaders.
The village council,
meeting as a committee of
the whole, Tuesday voted
6-0 to move the change onto
next week’s council agenda.
“Any organization that’s
working for the good of the
community would not be
charged a rental fee,” said
Council Trustee Mike
Cramer, who moved for
passage of the policy
change.
The council last month
decided to look into the
park rental policy after
Thornapple Kellogg

Schools band director Ray
Rickert complained about
village officials putting up
roadblocks to high school
students who wanted to per-
form outdoor concerts at the
downtown development
authority amphitheater on
two separate occasions over
the past nine months.
In one instance, a TK stu-
dent was told the amphithe-
ater needed to be reserved

several weeks in advance,
while in another instance, a
student was told a $
security deposit was needed
to access power at the
amphitheater. After hearing
Rickert’s complaint, the
council voted to allow
members of the TKHS jazz
band to play at the amphi-
theater at no charge.
Currently, a resident
wanting to reserve the
amphitheater has to pay a
$100 reservation fee. A non-
profit based in Middleville
would pay a $50 fee.
Someone from outside the
village wanting to reserve
the amphitheater would pay
a $200 reservation fee,
while a nonprofit outside of
the village would pay a
$150 reservation fee. A

See FEES, page 11


“I feel comfortable with
that, because everyone
(who is part) of those
organizations is a resident
that pays into the
general fund. I feel like
we’re double-dipping.”
Mike Cramer,
council trustee
Free download pdf