URBAN AIR POLLUTION MODELING 1169
to represent the actual conditions. Various authors have
proposed mathematical algorithms that include appropriate
modifications of Equation (1). In addition, a source-oriented
model developed by Roberts et al. (1970) to allow for time-
varying sources of emission is discussed below; see the section
“Time-Dependent Emissions (the Roberts Model).”
Chemical Kinetics: Removal or Transformation
of Pollutants
In the chemical-kinetics portion of the model, many differ-
ent approaches, ranging in order from the extremely simple
to the very complex, have been tried. Obviously the simplest
approach is to assume no chemical reactions are occurring at
all. Although this assumption may seem contradictory to our
intent and an oversimplification, it applies to any pollutant
that has a long residence time in the atmosphere. For exam-
ple, the reaction of carbon monoxide with other constituents
of the urban atmosphere is so small that it can be considered
inert over the time scale of the dispersion process, for which
the model is valid (at most a few hours).
Considerable simplification of the general problem can
be effected if chemical reactions are not included and all vari-
ables and parameters are assumed to be time-independent
(steady-state solution). In this instance, a solution is obtained
that forms the basis for most diffusion models: the use of the
normal bivariate or Gaussian distribution for the downwind
diffusion of effluents from a continuous point source. Its use
allows steady-state concentrations to be calculated both at
the ground and at any altitude. Many modifications to the
basic equation to account for plume rise, elevated sources,
area sources, inversion layers, and variations in chimney
heights have been proposed and used. Further discussion of
these topics is deferred to the following four sections.
The second level of pseudo-kinetic complexity assumes
first-order or pseudo-first-order reactions are responsible for
the removal of a particular pollutant; as a result, its concentra-
tion decays exponentially with time. In this case, a characteris-
tic residence time or half-life describes the temporal behavior
of the pollutant. Often, the removal of pollutants by chemical
reaction is included in the Gaussian diffusion model by simply
multiplying the appropriate diffusion equation by an exponen-
tial term of the form exp(− t / T ), where T represents the half-life
of the pollutant under consideration. Equations employing this
procedure are developed below. The interaction of sulfur diox-
ide with other atmospheric constituents has been treated in this
way by many investigators; for examples, see Roberts et al.
(1970) and Martin (1971). Chemical reactions are not the only
removal mechanism for pollutant. Some other processes con-
tributing to their disappearance may be absorption by plants,
soil-bacteria action, impact or adsorption on surfaces, and
washout (for example, see Figure 2^ ). To the extent that these
processes are simulated by or can be fitted to an exponential
decay, the above approximation proves useful and valid.
These three reactions appear in almost every chemical-
kinetic model. On the other hand, many different sets of equa-
tions describing the subsequent reactions have been proposed.
For example, Hecht and Seinfeld (1972) recently studied the
propylene-NO-air system and list some 81 reactions that can
occur. Any attempt to find an analytical solution for a model
utilizing all these reactions and even a simple diffusion sub-
model will almost certainly fail. Consequently, the number of
equations in the chemical-kinetic subroutine is often reduced
by resorting to a “lumped parameter” stratagem. Here, three
general types of chemical processes are identified: (1) a chain-
initiating process involving the inorganic reactions shown
above as well as subsequent interactions of product oxidants
with source and product hydrocarbons, to yield (2) chain-
propagating reactions in which free radicals are produced;
these free radicals in turn react with the hydrocarbon mix to
produce other free radicals and organic compounds to oxide
NO to NO 2 , and to participate in (3) chain-terminating reac-
tions; here, nonreactive end products (for example, peroxy-
acetylnitrate) and aerosol production serve to terminate the
chain. In the lumped-parameter representation, reaction-
rate equations typical of these three categories (and usually
selected from the rate-determining reactions of each category)
are employed, with adjusted rate constants determined from
appropriate smog-chamber data. An attempt is usually made
to minimize the number of equations needed to fit well a large
sample of smog-chamber data. See, for examples, the studies
of Friedlander^ and Seinfeld (1969) and Hecht and Seinfeld
(1972). Lumped parameter subroutines are primarily designed
to simulate atmospheric conditions with a simplified chemical-
kinetic scheme in order to reduce computing time when used
with an atmospheric diffusion model.
Elevated Sources and Plume Rise
When hot gases leave a stack, the plume rises to a certain
height dependent upon its exit velocity, temperature, wind
speed at the stack height, and atmospheric stability. There
are several equations used to determine the total or virtual
height at which the model considers the pollutants to be
emitted. The most commonly used is Holland’s equation:
H
v
u
P
TT
T
ssad
a
15 ..268 10−^2 ()
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
⎛
⎝
⎜
⎞
⎠
⎟
⎡
⎣
⎢
⎢
⎤
⎦
⎥
⎥
where
∆ H: plume rise
v s : stack velocity (m/sec)
d: stack diameter (m)
u: wind speed (m/sec)^
P: pressure (kPa)
T s : gas exit temperature (K)
T a : air temperature (K)
The virtual or effective stack height is
H h ∆ H
where
H: effective stack height
h: physical stack height
C021_001_r03.indd 1169C021_001_r03.indd 1169 11/18/2005 1:31:35 PM11/18/2005 1:31:35 PM