1240 VAPOR AND GASEOUS POLLUTANT FUNDAMENTALS
Mercury Vapor
Activated carbon, impregnated with elemental sulfur, has
been found effective for removing mercury vapor from air or
other gas streams (Lovett and Cunniff, 1974). Impregnating
the sulfur on activated carbon can increase the reaction rate
of mercury vapor and sulfur due to the enormous internal
surface area. When the carbon is spent, mercury can be
recovered by thermal oxidation in a retort.
Measurements of losses through roof vents help to deter-
mine overall fume control performance as summarized in the
Indoor Air Pollution article. The emission factors for various
sources are available from the US EPA’s Air Chief software.
These factors, referred to as AP-42 factors, are presented for
uncontrolled facilities as well as for facilities having air pol-
lution control equipment in place. Factors for which control
technology is indicated, do not necessarily reflect the best
available or state-of-the-art controls, but rather reflect the
level of (typical) control for which data were available at the
time the information was published.
The factors are strongly influenced by the type of
fuel being combusted and a separate chapter is devoted to
EXTERNAL COMBUSTION SOURCES. These include
steam/electric generating plants, industrial boilers, and com-
mercial and domestic combustion units. Coal, fuel oil, and
natural gas are the major fossil fuels used by these sources.
Liquefied petroleum fuels are also used in relatively small
quantities. A number of other fuel types are reviewed.
Power generation, process heating, and space heating
are some of the largest fuel combustion sources of sulfur
oxides, nitrogen oxides, and particulate emissions. The
commercially available control technology for removing
gaseous pollutants is discussed for each fuel. In addition to
the external combustion sources, other categories covered
are as follows:
(1) Solid Waste Disposal, (2) Stationary Internal
Combustion Sources, (3) Evaporation Loss Sources,
(4) Petroleum Industry, (5) Organic Chemical Process Industry,
(6) Liquid Storage Tanks, (7) Inorganic Chemical Industry,
(8) Food And Agricultural Industries, (9) Wood Product
Industries, (10) Mineral Products Industry, (11) Metallurgical
Industry, (12) Miscellaneous Sources, and (13) Greenhouse
Gas Biogenic Sources.
Because emission factors essentially represent an aver-
age of a range of emission rates, approximately half of
the subject sources will have emission rates greater than the
emission factor and the other half will have emission rates
less than the factor. As such, a permit limit using an AP-42
emission factor would result in half of the sources being in
noncompliance. Also, for some sources, sources often are
tested more frequently when they are new and when they are
believed to be operating properly, and either situation may
bias the results.
REFERENCES
- Andrew, S.P.S., Alta Technologia Chimica, Roma. P. 153, 1961.
- Anonymous, Federal Register, 43, No. 182, 42156, 1978.
3. Anonymous, National Air Pol. Contr. Admin., U.S. Depart. of H.E.W
Report AP-66, March 1970.
4. Astarita, G., Mass Transfer with Chemical Reaction, Elsevier Publish-
ing Co., Amsterdam, 1967.
5. Bird, R. et al., Transport Phenomena, Wiley, 1960.
6. Brooman, D.L. and E. Edgerley, Jr., J.A.P.C.A. 16, 25, 1966.
7. Brunaner, S., P.H. Emmett and E. Teller, J.A.C.S. 60, 309, 1938.
8. Cadle, R.D., in Air Pollution Handbook, Magill et al., eds., McGraw-
Hill, NY 1956.
9. Calderbank, P.H. and M.B. Moo-Young, Chem. Eng. Sci., 16, 39, 1961.
10. Charpentier, J.C., Recent progress in two phase gas-liquid mass trans-
fer in packed beds, The Chem. Eng. J., 11, 161, 1976.
11. Cook, W.H. and D. Basmadjion, Can. J. of Chem. Eng., 42, 146, 1964.
11a. Cooper, C.D. and F.C. Alley, Air Pollution Control a Design Approach,
Waveland Press; 2nd Ed. (1994).
12. Danckert, P.V., Gas Liquid Reaction, McGraw-Hill, NY 1970.
13. Devitt, T.W., B.A. Laseke and N. Kaplan, Utility flue gas desulfuriza-
tion in the U.S., Chem. Eng. Prog., 76 (5), p. 45, 1980.
14. Dulh, R.W., Methanol as boiler fuel, Chem. Eng. Prog., 72 (7), p. 75, 1976.
15. Ermence, E.D., Chem. Eng. Prog., 52, p. 1956.
16. Faucett, H.L., J.D. Maxwell and F.A. Burnett, Technical assessment of
NOx removal process for utility application, Joint Report, EPRIAF-568
and EPA-60017-77-127, 1977.
17. Fryling, G.R. ed., Combustion Engineering C.E. Inc., 1966.
18. Gamble, R.L., Fluidized bed combustion at Georgetown University,
Heat Engineering, April–June, p. 81, 1980.
19. Gerhard, E.R., in Air Pollution Handbook Magill et al., eds., McGraw-
Hill, NY 1956.
20. Hanst, P.L., J.A.P.C.A. 21, 269, 1971.
21. Hill, G.R., in Energy Technology IV (Proc. 4th Energy Technology
Conference, Washington, D.C.) p. 154, R.F. Hill ed., Government Insti-
tutes, Inc., 1977.
22. Kangas, J. et al., Chem. Eng. Sept. 6, 55–57, 1971.
23. Krevelen, V. and P.J. Hoftijzer, Chimie et Industrie: Numero Speiale du
XXIe Congre International de Chimie Industrielle, Bruxelles, p. 168,
1948 (cited by Dackwert, 1970).
24. Laider, K.J., Chemical Kinetics, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1965.
25. Langmuir, I., J.A.C.S. 40, 1361, 1918.
26. Laurent, A. and J.C. Charpentier, The Chem. Eng. J 8, 85, 1974.
27. Lee, D.R., Heat Piping and Air Cond., 42 (4), p. 76, 1970.
28. Lovett, W.D. and F.T. Cunniff, Air pollution control by activated
carbon, Chem. Eng. Prog. 70 (s), 43, 1974.
29. Mars, P. and J.G.H. Maessen, J. Catal., 10, 1, 1968.
30. Mohunta, D.M., A.S. Vaidynanathan and G.S. Laddha, Indian Chem.
Eng., 11, 39, 1969 (Cited by Charpentier, 1976).
31. McCarthy, J.E., Scrubber types and selection criteria, Chem. Eng.
Prog., 76 (5), p. 58, 1980.
32. McCutchen, G.D., NOx Emissions trends and Federal Regulation,
Chem. Eng. Prog., 73 (8), p. 58, 1977.
33. Niepenburg, H., J. Fuel Heat Technol., 14, 34, 1966.
34. Onda, K., H. Takeuchi and Y. Okumato, J. Chem. Eng., (Japan) 1, 56,
1968.
35. Onda, K., H. Takeuchi and Koyama, Kagaku Kogaku, 31, 126, 1967.
36. Parkinson, G., NOx Controls: Many new systems undergo trials, Chem.
Eng., March 9, p. 39, 1981.
37. Princiotta, F.T., Advances in SO 2 Stack Gas Scrubbing, Chem. Eng.
Prog., 74 (2), p. 58, 1978.
38. Ricci, L.J., Nixing NOx Chem. Eng. Feb. 14. p. 33, April 11, p. 48, and
April 25, p. 70, 1977.
39. Ray, G.C. and E.O. Boxes, Jr., Ind and Eng., 42, 1315, 1950.
40. Reid, R., T.K. Sherwood and J.M. Prausnitz, The Properties of Gases
and Liquids, McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 1977.
41. Sensenbauge, J.D., and J. Jonakin, Effect of combustion conditions
on nitrogen oxide formation in boiler furnaces, Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.,
Paper 60-WA-334, 1960.
42. Sherwood, T.K., R.L. Pigford and C.R. Wilke, Mass Transfer, McGraw-
Hill, N.Y., 1975.
43. Schmidt, A.X. and H. List, Material and Energy Balances, Prentice
Hall, 1962.
44. Specht, R.C. and R.R. Calaceto, Chem. Eng. Prog., 63, May, p. 78,
1967.
C022_001_r03.indd 1240 11/18/2005 2:33:16 PM