FOSSIL FUEL CLEANING PROCESSES 421
The sulfur from a claus plant may be produced in vari-
ous forms, such as liquid, fl aked or prilled. Form of choice is
determined by transportation mode and end usage.
Dry bed absorption — catalytic conversion ( Haines
Process ) In the Haines Process (see Figure 9), sulfur is removed
from sour natural gas using zeolites or molecular seives.
Hydrogen sulfi de is absorbed from the gas on a bed of
zeolites until the bed becomes saturated with H 2 S. The bed is
then regenerated with hot SO 2 bearing gases, generated from
burning a part of the liquid sulfur production.
The zeolite catalyzes the reaction of H 2 S form sulfur
vapor. The regeneration effl uent gases are cooled and sulfur
is condensed.
Liquid media absorption — air oxidation Most com-
monly in use in Europe for removal and recovery of sulfur
from manufactured gases such as coal gas or coke oven gas,
several processes in this category are available today.
Typically, the process scheme involves absorption of
H 2 S in a slightly alkaline solution containing oxygen carri-
ers. Regeneration of the solution is by air oxidation. The H 2 S
is oxidized to elemental sulfur. Figure 10 shows the typical
processing scheme.
The air also acts as a fl otation agent for the sulfur which
is collected at the regenerated solution surface as a froth. The
sulfur sludge is either fi ltered or centrifuged to yield a sulfur
cake which may be recovered as a wet paste or dry powder.
Liquid media absorption — direct conversion ( Townsend
Process ) The Townsend Process is perhaps one of the newest
sulfur removal processes on the scene today. Still in forma-
tive stages of development, its potential advantages point to
it directly challenging the other conventional system con-
taining an amine plant, a dehydration plant and a claus sulfur
plant. The Townsend plant offers the added advantage of
recovering a higher percentage of the sulfur.
The Townsend Process uses an aqueous solution of an
organic solvent such as triethylene glycol to contact the sour
gas and simultaneously sweeten the gas, dehydrate the gas
and convert the gas to elemental sulfur.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS
Trowbridge^10 states that reductions in lead content of fuel oil
are occurring world wide. Unleaded mo gas originally intro-
duced in California in 1975 is now available throughout the
U.S., where permissible maximum lead levels were estab-
lished at 0.1 grams/gal after 1986. Trowbridge describes
additional environmental concerns and fuel treatment proce-
dures which are summarized below:
- ozone formation—reduction of gasoline vapor
pressure - carbon monoxide emissions—add oxygenates to
blend - benzene emissions—reduce fraction in reformate
by extraction for example.
DESULFURIZATION OF COAL
Although coal buring accounts for only about 1/4 of the
nation’s energy, approximately 2/3 of all the sulfur dioxide
emitted in the United States is traceable to its usage. And
since coal supplies far outstrip gas and oil reserves, interest
in coal desulfurization is great.
Presently, however, there are no processes suffi ciently
developed, either technically or commercially, which have any
signifi cant impact on the industry. The following is, therefore,
SWEET GAS
SOUR GAS
LEGEND
RICH SOLUTION
LEAN
SOLUTION
FILTRATE
AIR
SULFUR FROTH
LIQUID MEDIA ABSORPTION
A R F
SK
A - ABSORBER
R - REGENERATOR
SK - SKIM TANK
F - FILTER
SULFUR CAKE
FIGURE 10
C006_002_r03.indd 421C006_002_r03.indd 421 11/18/2005 10:27:11 AM11/18/2005 10:27:11 AM