GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 447
The groundwater remediation can never be complete so long
as mobile contaminants remain in the vadose zone. Currently,
there are two basic approaches for decontamination, namely
ex situ and in situ techniques. Ex situ remediation requires
excavation with on-site or off-site treatment, while the in situ
remediation removes (or treats) the contaminants in place,
thus minimizing disturbance to the site. Since excavation
may not be feasible in many situations, the in situ remedia-
tion approach, in general, is technically and economically
superior. As a result, a number of in situ remedial technolo-
gies have been developed to treat contamination in the soil.
These remedial actions can be grouped into the following
general categories based on their characteristics.
Physical Treatment Physical treatment is a relatively simple
and safe approach compared with other treatment methods.
Since no foreign materials are introduced into the formation,
there is little chance that the contamination situation will be
worsened.
The soil vapor extraction (SVE) method, known as soil
venting, in situ volatilization, enhanced volatilization, or
soil vacuum extraction, is one of the most popular physical
treatment technologies. In this process, a vacuum is applied
through extraction wells to create a pressure gradient that
induces transport of chemical volatiles through the soil to
extraction wells. This technology has been widely used in
volatile organic compound (VOC) removal from the vadose
zone, and it can also be useful in decontaminating ground-
water, since the lowered VOC vapor pressure in the vadose
zone will increase volatilization of contaminants in the
groundwater. Principal factors governing the applicability of
SVE include contaminant distribution at the site, site hydro-
geology, and contaminant properties. In general, SVE is an
effective process for highly permeable formations such as
sand, but is ineffective for low-permeability formations such
as silt and clay, since tight formations restrict the airflow
through the porous medium.
Pump-and-treat is a physical treatment technology used
for the saturated zone in combination with other technolo-
gies. Contaminated groundwater is pumped out of the forma-
tion and treated either off-site or on-site. This technology is
commonly applied to reduce the rate of plume migration, or
to confine the plume to a potentiometric low area. In addition,
physical containment systems (cutoff walls, reactive barriers,
etc.) have been used. The primary objective is to construct a
physical impediment to groundwater flow.
Chemical Treatment In general, chemical methods for
detoxification of contaminants in the soil are severely hin-
dered by the difficulties of dispersing chemical amendments
into the formation. As such, most attempts of chemical in situ
treatments have been limited to chemical spills or dump
sites where near-surface contaminated soil could be treated.
Potential chemical reactions of the treatment reagents with
the soils and wastes must be considered with all chemical
treatments. Since most hazardous-waste disposal sites con-
tain a mixture of contaminants, a treatment approach that
may neutralize one contaminant could render another more
toxic or mobile. In addition, the chemical amendment intro-
duced into the soils may create new pollution. The general
chemical treatments include solidification-stabilization,
neutralization, and oxidation-reduction.
The solidification-stabilization method is designed to
make contaminants physically bound or enclosed within a
stabilized mass. This method includes inducing chemical
reactions between the stabilizing agent and contaminants
to reduce their mobility. Neutralization involves injecting
dilute acids or bases into the ground to adjust the pH. This
pH adjustment can serve as pretreatment prior to oxidation-
reduction or biological remediation. The oxidation-reduction
method consists of using oxidation-reduction reactions to
alter the oxidation state of a compound through loss or gain
of electrons, respectively. Such reactions can detoxify and
solubilize metals and organics. This technology is a standard
wastewater-treatment approach, but its application as in situ
treatment is limited.
Biological Treatment The ultimate goal of biological treat-
ment is to achieve biodegradation of the organic chemicals.
From attempts to utilize bacterial cultures to sophisticated
genetic-engineering applications, a myriad of biodegradation
technologies have been explored. Since a large portion of the
hazardous-waste contamination in the United States stems
from petroleum-hydrocarbon products that have been dis-
charged or spilled into the soil at petroleum refineries, airports,
and military bases, bioremediation has become an accepted,
simple, and effective cleanup method. Basically, there are two
approaches: stimulating the growth of “indigenous” microor-
ganism populations and adding new “endigenous” microor-
ganisms. Biological treatments may utilize either one or both
of these approaches.
Many toxic organic chemicals can be metabolized or
degraded to some degree by indigenous soil microorganisms.
This natural process can be accelerated by pumping oxygen
and nutrients into the contaminated zone to stimulate the resi-
dent microorganisms. However, if the infiltration rate is low,
remediation may be a very slow process.
In the endigenous approach, genetically endigenous
microorganisms are introduced into the formation to clean
the contaminants. There are two major difficulties in this
approach. First, the dispersal of introduced organisms
throughout the contaminated zone is very difficult, since
microorganisms tend to be absorbed by solid particles and
become clustered. Second, the newly introduced organisms
may destroy the microbial balance once the porous medium
has become decontaminated, which creates new ecological
problems.
Overall, a significant engineering deficiency with in situ
bioremediation is the absence of proven methods to intro-
duce degrading populations of microorganisms, nutrients,
and other chemicals into the subsurface environment for
efficient mixing with microorganisms and the contaminants
of concern. In addition, the infiltration rate is an important
governing parameter to the effectiveness of the process.
C007_003_r03.indd 447C007_003_r03.indd 447 11/18/2005 10:28:26 AM11/18/2005 10:28:26 AM