29
AIR POLLUTANT EFFECTS
AIR POLLUTANTS
Air pollutants fall into two main categories: (1) those that
are pervasive throughout areas because they are the products
of daily-life activities such as transportation, power genera-
tion, space and water heating, and waste incineration, and
(2) those generated by activities such as chemical, manufac-
turing, and agricultural processing whose pollutant byprod-
ucts tend to be localized in nearby areas or are spread long
distances by tall stacks and prevailing winds.
Air pollutants are also categorized by their emission
characteristics: (1) point sources, such as power plants,
incinerators, and large processing plants; (2) area sources,
such as space and water heating in buildings; and (3) mobile
sources, mainly cars and trucks, but also lawn mowers and
blowers and airplanes.
The United States has established National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for seven pollutants that are
pervasive and are threats to public health and welfare. The
Clean Air Act, which initiated this program, was passed in
1963 and last amended in 1990. The primary standards are
intended to protect health, and the secondary standards pro-
tect public-welfare interests such as visibility and danger to
animals, crops, and buildings.
The standards reflect, for the most part but not always,
a conservative approach in favor of the protection of health.
It is notable that the public, who in the final analysis must
pay the cost, appears to be firmly committed to enforcement
of the standards without overwhelming concern for costs.
The act requires the states to determine the status of their air
quality and to find and introduce the controls that will enable
them to meet these standards. Their proposal describing how
and when the standards will be met is submitted to the EPA
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) as an implementa-
tion plan for approval. Meeting target dates for air-quality
standards has been problematic because the complex system
that has to be managed includes important socioeconomic and
political factors. For example, the close connection between
air quality and daily activities such as transportation, waste
disposal, and the heating of homes and workplaces requires
education of the population to obtain their support for alterna-
tive and perhaps costly lifestyle choices in the vehicles they
purchase, the packaging of articles they choose, and the type
and cost of the fuels they use—choices they may be reluc-
tant to make, even if they will improve the quality of their
air environment. Choices benefiting air quality that carry
disadvantages for important sectors of the economy are usu-
ally skillfully discouraged by some of those sectors.
CONTROL OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS
Control of the criteria pollutants requires a measurement
program to determine the daily and short-term patterns of
the ambient concentrations, identification of the emitting
sources, and design and implementation of strategies for
their control. A detailed inventory of the sources causing
the pollution is prepared. The effectiveness of control tech-
nology and potential regulatory strategies are evaluated and
their availability determined with consideration given to the
economic and political restraints on their implementation.
In other words, the total system to be managed and its inter-
actions have to be detailed and understood in order to evalu-
ate the potential for successful control of the air pollution
in an area.
The amount of exposure to the pollutants from inde-
pendent or grouped sources depends upon the intensity of
the activities producing the emissions, the effectiveness of
the controls, and the quality of the surveillance instituted to
ensure the continued proper use and maintenance of the con-
trols. A factor that can be overwhelming is the pattern of the
local meteorology and its effectiveness in dispersing emit-
ted pollutants. The effects of dispersions from one area upon
downwind areas should also be considered.
Detailed analysis of data accumulated over many years
using unchanging analytical methods has shown that very
significant changes in an area’s air pollution can take place
from year to year without significant changes in controls, pri-
marily as the result of changes in the local weather patterns.
The combination of 10 years of data at three sampling sites in
New York City showed that its sulfur-dioxide pollution prob-
lems was clearly related to the sulfur content of the fuel that
was burned in the city. The data for a 10-year period were
combined on a week-by-week basis, with the result that the
shape of the 10-year curve for ambient sulfur-dioxide con-
centrations and the long-term temperature curve for the city
could be superimposed with significant success. Therefore,
the sometimes great variations found between years when
little change occurred in controls were caused by variations
in the local atmosphere, demonstrating that the success or
failure of control strategies cannot be evaluated with security
over short intervals of time.
C001_003_r03.indd 29 11/22/2005 11:06:02 AM