Encyclopedia of Environmental Science and Engineering, Volume I and II

(Ben Green) #1
627

M

MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES


RADIOACTIVE WASTE

Radioactive waste may be defined as solid, liquid, or gaseous
material of negligible economic value containing radionu-
clides in excess of threshold quantities. High level wastes
(HLW) are produced in the first cycle of reprocessing spent
nuclear material and are strongly radioactive. Intermediate level
wastes (ILW) can be divided into short lived, with half lives of
twenty years or less, and long lived, in which the half lives
of some constituents may be thousands of years. Low level
wastes (LLW) contain less than 4 GBq/ton of alpha emitters
and less than 12 GBq/ton of beta and gamma emitters. Very
low level waste (VLLW) contains activity concentrations
less than 0.4 MBq/ton.

ACTIVITY AND EXPOSURE

The Becquerel (Bq) is the activity of one radionuclide having
one spontaneous disintegration per second. One Curie (Ci)
is defined as 3.7  10 10 disintegrations per second. The
Becquerel is the more commonly used unit. The unit of ion-
izing radiation which corresponds to energy absorption of
100 ergs per gram is the rad (roentgen-absorption-dose).
The newer unit is the Gray (Gy), which is equal to 100 rads.
The amount of radiation which produces energy dissipation
in the human body equivalent to one roentgen of X-rays is
the rem (roentgen-equivalent-man). One Sievert is equal to
100 rems and is the commonly accepted unit.

Philosophy

The group of people engaged in management of radioac-
tive wastes has evolved from a small body of operators who,
originally with little or no expert knowledge, were engaged
in day-to-day solution of unpleasant problems. They now
form a recognized profession, extending from whole-time
research scientists to field workers who in some countries
are conducting a profit-making industry.

The members of the profession came mainly from Health
Physics and brought with them the caution and “conserva-
tive” attitude to radiation hazards characteristic of Health
Physicists. They regard their mission as being to ensure that
members of the public, as well as workers in the field of
nuclear energy, will not be harmed by the radioactive mate-
rial for which they are responsible. With their Health Physics
background this sometimes leads to an attitude which indus-
try regards as overrestrictive, although recent controversies
have tended to cast them ironically in the role of particularly
dangerous polluters of the environment.
It is clear that any human activity that involves conversion
of something into something different must produce waste.
Conversion of energy from one from to another is no excep-
tion. It is sometimes possible for an industry to recycle its
waste products and to convert part of them to a useful form,
but there is always some minimal residue which cannot be
retained within the system. This must find some place within
the environment. Usually the cheapest procedure is to dis-
charge it in some way that will ensure a sufficient dilution
to make it innocuous. If this is impracticable for technical or
political reasons it must be confined, but usually the more
effective the confinement, the higher the cost. To say that a
process must be conducted with now waste is equivalent to
saying that the process may not be conducted at all, and to
demand a certain level of confinement or restriction of wastes
implies an acceptance of the cost of the waste management
system as a necessary part of the cost of the process.
Discharge of potentially noxious materials into the envi-
ronment involves some risk, which may or may not be mea-
surable. Within very broad limits research in nuclear hazards
enables us to forecast the effects of exposure of large groups
of people, for extended periods, to low doses of radiation.
We can also estimate, with less accuracy, the probability that
an individual will suffer some harm from such exposure, and
we can say with much greater confidence what will happen
if an individual is exposed to larger doses—say 50 rem and
upwards—in a single dose. The nuclear industry, then, can
provide some information on the probable consequences of
environmental contamination extended over a lifetime, and

C013_001_r03.indd 627C013_001_r03.indd 627 11/18/2005 10:38:18 AM11/18/2005 10:38:18 AM

Free download pdf