OIL SPILLAGE INTO WATER—TREATMENT 807
effi cient and logistically simple method for eliminating oil
under certain conditions. As a backup for mechanical cleanup
techniques, in-situ burning can provide a useful means of elim-
inating large quantities of oil quickly, while avoiding the need
for recovered oil storage containers. Anyone considering the
use of burning should be sure that all regulatory controls have
been satisfi ed, that the ignition and burning operations can be
carried out safety, and that the temporary reductions in local air
quality represent the lower of all other environmental impacts
should the spilled oil not be burned.”
TREATMENT OF THE SURFACE OIL
Chemical Treatment of Surface Oil Should Be
Considered as an Alternate Solution
It is generally agreed, as indicated above, that situations can
arise where the spill cannot be contained and recovered because
sea conditions, weather state, and so on, are beyond the cur-
rent operating capability of containment devices. There are
also instances wherein the logistics of containment and recov-
ery equipment, that is, containment boom availability and/or
deployment time and effort, could indicate chemical treatment
as the most practical and expedient handling technique. When
physical recovery of the oil pollutant is impractical, there are,
in effect, two courses of action possible. In one case, the oil
may be permitted to remain as intact cohesive slick on the
surface of the water and possibly reach shore. The alternate
course is to “treat” this surface oil—such treatment essentially
directed toward the removal of the oil from the water surface
and the enhancement of its ultimate removal from the environ-
ment. This many be accomplished by chemical dispersion.
The Ecological and Economic Damage Caused by an
Untreated Oil Spill Can Be Extensive
The damage resulting from an untreated oil spill is both visu-
ally apparent and extensive. It encompasses both biological
as well as property damage. The potential damage may be
summarized as follows:
Marine fowl, particularly diving birds, are particularly
vulnerable to an oil spill. As reported by Nelson-Smith,^13
sea birds are most obvious victims of an oil spill due to
“mechanical damage.” The oil penetrates and clogs the
plumage which the bird depends upon for waterproofi ng and
heat insulation. For example, a duck with oil-impregnated
plumage is under the same stress at a moderate temperature
of 59 F as a normal bird would be under a more severe
temperature condition at −4F. Some statistics regarding bird
damage have been cited by McCaull.^14 More than 25,000
birds, mostly guillemots and razorbills, were killed after the
Torrey Canyon grounding. The guillemot casualties equaled
the entire breeding stock between the Isle of Wright and
Cardigan Bay. Bird losses in the Santa Barbara spill, accord-
ing to the state Department of Fish and Game, totaled 3500.
Shore contamination by beached oil represents biologi-
cal, as well as property damage. The tendency of oil to cling
to shore surfaces, such as beach sand, sea walls, and the resul-
tant property damage, are well established. This is perhaps
the most apparent and widely publicized damaging aspect as
attested by lawsuits on the part of tourist interests, property
owners, etc. There is also, in a biological sense, a physical
smothering effect on some attached, intertidal organisms
such as mussels and barnacles. The effects of untreated oil
coming ashore is well illustrated by Blumer et al.^15 regarding
a No. 2 diesel fuel spill from the barge Florida in Buzzards
Bay, Massachusetts in September 1969. Oil was incorpo-
rated into the bottom sediment to at least 10 meters of water
depth, testifying to the wetting effect of untreated oil in
this instance, the oil was physically dispersed by the heavy
seas but retained its adhesive characteristics. Therefore, it
is deduced that the oil droplets probably came into contact
with and wetted and upswept, suspended particulates which
later settled again to the bottom. Other spill instances depict-
ing the importance of this aspect that of the incorporation of
oil into the sediment-have been reported by Murphy.^16 In the
Buzzards Bay and several other spill incidents of distillate
fuels cited by Murphy, there has been a signifi cant kill of all
marine life in the area since these highly aromatic products
are known to be much more toxic than whole crude oil.
Persistent tarry agglomerates are formed as the spilled oil
weathers at sea. There has been increasing attention directed
to the presence of tar-like globules ranging up to 10 cm in
diameter in the open sea. As reported by Baker^17 during the
voyage of Thor Heyerdahl’s papyrus boat, Ra, during fi ve
separate days, they sailed through masses of these agglomer-
ates whose age could be substantiated by the growth of goose
barnacles adhering to them. There have been other inci-
dents reported recently by the International Oceanographic
Foundation^18 and a well documented survey was made by
the research craft, R.V. Atlantis, as reported by Horn et al.^19
In this latter investigation, tarry agglomerates were present
in 75% of over 700 hauls with a surface skimming (neuston)
net in the Mediterranean Sea and eastern North Atlantic. The
amount of tar in some areas was estimated at 0.5 milliliter in
volume per square meter of sea surface.
The Behavior of Spilled Oil at Sea
Before consideration of the mechanism of dispersing oil and
its associated effects, an understanding of the behavior of
spilled oil at sea will be useful. When a volume of oil is
spilled onto the surface of water, the oil has a driving force
to fi lm out or spread-in essence, a spreading pressure usually
expressed as a Spreading Coeffi cient. This Spreading S o/w ,
is readily quantifi ed and is determined by a balance of the
surface tension forces as follows.
So/w gg gw o/w o,
(1)
wherein:
S o/w is the spreading coeffi cient for oil on water
ergs/cm^2 or dynes/cm
C015_002_r03.indd 807C015_002_r03.indd 807 11/18/2005 10:56:38 AM11/18/2005 10:56:38 AM