834 PARTICULATE REMOVAL
cyclone testing. Studies of the effect of loading on grade effi-
ciency have shown 24,25 that cyclone efficiency is very sen-
sitive to dust loadings, and for this reason a correction to
equation (1) is necessary for other concentrations:
d
D
L
L
50
50
°^02
=
°
⎛
⎝⎜
⎞
⎠⎟
.
, (2)
where the reference loading L is 5 grains/ft^3. Using Eq. (2)
for d 50 , efficiency for other particle diameters d can be found
from Figure 3.
Equation (1) can give directional effects for many geo-
metric changes in design; but if data are available on the actual
geometry of interest, it is much more satisfactory to use such
data to modify the numerical constant in the equation. It is
especially important to note that modifications to outlet pipe
diameter to not enter into Eq. (1), and the numerical constant
is for cyclones with normal ratios of outlet to inlet area of 1.3
to 1.5. For certain applications area ratios well below 1.0 are
now being offered. Such cyclones have higher pressure drop.
Unfortunately, suitable published data are not available on this
effect to permit quantitative prediction of effect on efficiency.
Although some reviews have compiled “consensus”
dimensions for cyclone design, quite a range of relative
dimensions exists within the bounds of good design practice.
Design is a compromise among efficiency, cyclone through-
put, and pressure drop, and improvement in one factor will
Clean Gas
Collected Dust
Dirty Gas
FIGURE 2 Conventional cyclone opera-
tion (The Ducon Co.).
99.9
99.8
99.5
99
98
95
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
5
2
1
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1 2 5 8 10 20
RELATIVE PARTICLE SIZE,
COLLECTION EFFICIENCY, %
d
d 50
FIGURE 3 Generalized cyclone grade efficiency.
C016_002_r03.indd 834C016_002_r03.indd 834 11/18/2005 1:06:45 PM11/18/2005 1:06:45 P