Encyclopedia of Environmental Science and Engineering, Volume I and II

(Ben Green) #1

PARTICULATE REMOVAL 837


An excellent monograph on practical aspects of pre-
cipitator specification, operation, testing, maintenance, and
troubleshooting has been recently published by Katz.^33
Precipitator Operation Electrostatic precipitators have
been constructed in a great many configurations. Contemporary

commercial practice is fairly standard, however, and only
this will be considered here. A typical precipitator, shown in
Figure 8, consists of an array of parallel vertical plates, spaced
about 9 or 10 in. spacing. Rows of wires hang vertically
between the plates. These wires, called discharge electrodes,
are maintained at a voltage of 30–60 kV with respect to the
grounded plates. The very high electric field gradient near the
wire electrode produces a corona discharge generating a high
concentration of ions, which in turn charge the dust particles
in the flowing gas stream. Under influence of the voltage
gradient particles migrate to the plates, also called collector
electrodes, where the charge is largely dissipated. A residual
charge retains particles on the plates, and they are periodically
dislodged by rapping. When dislodged, the particles fall in
clumps into collection hoppers beneath the electrodes.
Gas flow across a flat plate surface tends to re-entrain
collected dust particles causing an appreciable debit to col-
lection efficiency. Various types of baffles are therefore used
to shield the plate surface and provide a stagnant collection
zone. The usual baffles are vertical and are perpendicular to
the plate surface. They are typically 20 in. apart and extend
1.5 in. from the plate surface. Experimental and theoretical
studies have shown that with such baffles re-entrainment of
typical dusts by gas flow at the plate surface is not signifi-
cant at gas velocities below 6 to 8 ft/sec.^34 This is well above
recommended precipitator gas velocity.
The power supply for a precipitator consists of a high
voltage step-up transformer and a rectifier. Rectifiers of
various types have been used over the years, but solid state
silicon rectifiers are almost universal in new installations.
Unfiltered double half wave rectification is usually used.
Full wave rectification is preferable for certain high current
applications, and a simple change in connections usually
suffices to change between the two wave forms.
Particle collection is enhanced by high voltage and current,
but excessive voltage causes undesirable arcing or sparking
between the electrodes. An arc is an ionized short circuit which
diverts most current away from charging and collecting parti-
cles and also causes an undesirable voltage drop. Impingement
of the arc on dust collected on the plate electrode can cause
reentrainment. Optimum overall collection efficiency usually
occurs when power input is adjusted to a spark rate of about
50–100 discharges/min. Modern precipitator control systems
will automatically adjust voltage to maintain a preset spark-
ing rate. Saturable core reactor control came into use in the
late 1950’s and a decade later this was being supplanted by
entirely solid state (thyristor, i.e. silicon controlled rectifier or
“S.C.R.”) controls. SCR control has appreciably lower power
losses and much faster response characteristics than the satu-
rable core reactor and is able to operate at appreciably higher
voltage and current without excessive sparking.
Large precipitators are usually sectionalized into several
chambers in parallel and (within chambers) several electri-
cal fields in series with respect to gas flow. Chambers can
usually be independently isolated from gas flow so that
one chamber may be shut down for maintenance while the
others remain on stream. Use of several electrical fields in
series permits optimum voltage control in each field. Outlet

FIGURE 6 Typical manifolding arrangement of multicellular
cyclones. (Courtesy: Wheelabrator Air Pollution Control.)

100

80

60

40

20

0
510 152025
PARTICLE DIAMETER, MICRONS

COLLECTION EFFICIENCY, %

Efficiency Of
Single Element

Efficiency Of
Multiple Array

FIGURE 7 Performance debit for manifolding of multicones.

C016_002_r03.indd 837C016_002_r03.indd 837 11/18/2005 1:06:46 PM11/18/2005 1:06:46 P

Free download pdf