PCBs AND ASSOCIATED AROMATICS 895
Tables 27 and 28 show the calculated daily intake of
PCDDs and PCDFs from foods. The values used for the
daily intake of different types of food were derived from
“Nutrition Survey Data, Japanese Agency of Health and
Welfare, Daiichi Press, Tokyo, 1982” as reported by Y.
Takizawa and H. Muto^72.
Table 29 compares the ratio of PCDD : PCDF isomers
found in both the calculated values from foods and the
observed ratios in human tissues.
There seems to be a good correlation between the dietary
intake of PCDDs and PCDFs and the amounts found in each
of the tissue types except for octachlorinated isomers. The
reason for this may be that the source of O 8 CDDs in tis-
sues may be other than food. The best correlation is found
between the penta-hepta isomers. Since there are a large
number of factors which have not been considered in these
tables, such as obesity and pharmacokinetics, it is somewhat
surprising that the correlations are as good as they are.
People in industrialized countries have an adipose
tissue level of PCDDs of about 1000–1200 ppt whereas
people in non-industrialized countries have much lower
levels. PCDF levels in industrialized countries are not
usually below 50 ppt.
The estimation of health risk to humans was initially
based on the amount of 2,3,7,8-TCDD/F present. In order to
better estimate the risk caused by exposure to a mixture of
different PCDD and PCDF isomers the concept of “TCDD
Equivalents” have been introduced. Several models have
TABLE 25
Aroclor 1016 contains 0.4% by weight of PCBs with more
than 4 Cl substituents
PCB isomer Weight % PCDF isomers
produced by pyrolysis
2,3,4,3,5 0.16 1,2,3,6,8-
2,4,6,7-
2,3,6,2,3, 0.01 1,2,8,9-
1,2,6,9-
1,4,6-
2,3,6,3,5 0.01 2,4,6,9-
1,2,6,8-
2,3,6,2,5 0.18 1,2,6,9-
1,4,6,9-
1,2,8-
1,4,8-
2,4,6,2,3 0.04 1,2,7,9-
1,3,8,9-
1,3,6-
2,4,3,4 0.14 1,3,7,8-
2,4,5,4 1.35 1,3,4,7-
2,4,2,4 1.81 1,3,7,9-
2,3,2,3 0.18 1,2,8,9-
2,3,4,2 2.00 1,2,3,9-
2,3,2,5 1.14 1,2,6,9-
2,4,2,5 3.48 1,3,6,9-
2,4,5,2 1.41 1,3,4,9-
2,3,2,6 0.33 triCDFs
2,3,5,2 0.47 1,2,4,9-
2,3,2,6 0.33 triCDFs
2,3,5,2 0.47 1,2,4,9-
2,4,6,4 2.40 triCDFs
2,5,2,5 4.35 1,4,6,9-
2,5,2,6 1.07 triCDFs
2,3,6,2 1.00 triCDFs
2,6,2,6 0.19 triCDFs
C016_003_r03.indd 895C016_003_r03.indd 895 11/18/2005 1:12:37 PM11/18/2005 1:12:37 PM