Barron's - USA (2021-07-12)

(Antfer) #1

26 BARRON’S July 12, 2021


TECH TRADER


Observability tools seek clues to network health


much as doctors diagnose illnesses by looking


for symptoms that point to internal issues.


TheNextTechTrend


Is Here—It’s Worth


Paying Attention


O


ne of the chal-


lenges of modern


enterprise com-


puting is keeping


track of what’s


going on inside


your network.


Cutting-edge information-technology


systems are a messy brew of public


clouds, private clouds, old-school data


centers, third-party apps, edge comput-


ing, and mobile workers. Keeping tabs


on what’s working—and what isn’t—is


a gigantic challenge. The good news for


investors is that the result is an enor-


mous emerging market.


Once blandly known as infrastruc-


ture management tools, the market for


this stuff now has a sexier, slightly


Orwellian name: “observability.” Com-


panies like Datadog (ticker: DDOG),


Dynatrace (DT), Elastic (ESTC), and


Splunk (SPLK) provide observability


tools to help IT departments monitor


their networks’ health. With enterprise


tech spending poised to accelerate com-


ing out of the pandemic, observability


players should be big beneficiaries.


In a research note last week, Citi


software analyst Tyler Radke laid out


a bullish case for the group generally—


and for Datadog, Dynatrace, and Elas-


tic in particular. “We see a positive out-


look for observability spending, with


signs it could reaccelerate as IT spend-


ing recovers and as digitization projects


pick up,” Radke writes.


While observability is a relatively


new buzzword, the concept has been


around for decades. “The term observ-


ability dates back over six decades to


1960 and has its roots in engineering


and mathematical applications,” he


explains. “Observability was defined


as a ‘measure of how well internal


states of a system can be inferred from


knowledge of its external outputs.’ ”


In other words, observability tools


seek clues to network health much as


doctors diagnose illnesses by looking


for symptoms that point to internal


issues. Radke notes the market has


three pillars: infrastructure monitoring


(why is the network so slow?);


application-performance management


(what’s up with my apps?); and log


management and telemetry (why are


we getting errors and service tickets?).


“Having visibility into these three com-


ponents allows organizations to iden-


tify service issues, and isolate them,


whether it is an infrastructure or appli-


cation issue, and remediate,” he writes.


In an interview, Radke says he has


been getting questions from the buy


side about whether the market is big


enough to support the heady growth


rates of leading players. He’s convinced


that the opportunity is substantial, at


an estimated $55 billion in 2025, about


triple the forecast from Gartner. He


thinks some estimates rely too heavily


on revenue from legacy on-premise


tools providers, rather than anticipat-


ing the growing adoption of cloud-


based applications.


Radke is particularly keen on Data-


dog, which provides both infrastruc-


turemanagement and application-


performance monitoring tools, ranking


it as one of his favorite overall enter-


prise software stocks. The stock isn’t


cheap. Datadog shares trade for 28


times estimated 2022 sales, and profits


are too small for the price/earnings


ratio to be meaningful. But he sees


“durable growth powered by continued


robust new customer additions, and


multiproduct strength,” and contends


that the premium valuation reflects a


combination of premium growth, im-


proving profitability, and potential for


upside to consensus estimates.


He also likes Dynatrace for its po-


sition in application monitoring for


large enterprises, and he’s keen on


Elastic’s combination of observability


tools and search software. He’s less


excited about Splunk, a company I’ve


written about that has been ham-


pered by an ongoing business-model


transition that is crimping financial


results. But all four will benefit if IT


spending follows the script and picks


up in the second half.


A


pple (AAPL) shares hit a re-


cord last week, pushing its mar-


ket cap to an astounding $2.4


trillion. It was the stock’s first


new high since January, reflecting grow-


ing anticipation of June-quarter financial


results, now two weeks away, and the fall


launch of iPhone 13.


In the March quarter, hardware


sparkled—sales were up 66% for


iPhones, 70% for Macs, and 79% for


iPads—overshadowing 27% growth in


services. That segment includes com-


missions generated from the App


Store, where it sells programs for


iPhones and other devices; revenue


from streaming services like Apple


Music and Apple TV+; and other


services like Apple Care and iCloud.


There’s growing risk to Apple’s role


as a gatekeeper and toll taker for app


distribution. Last week, a group of state


attorneys general sued Google over its


control of the Android Play Store. Sim-


ilar litigation against Apple seems inev-


itable. And as Cowen Washington Re-


search Group analyst Paul Gallant


asserts, new rules for app stores from


the Federal Trade Commission, now


led by Lina Khan, are likely.


How much risk is there? Services


were 16% of revenue in the latest six


months. Apple said recently that the


“app store ecosystem” generated $643


billion in revenue in 2020, about 90%


outside the store itself (booking rides


on Uber, say, or buying goods on


Amazon). That implies $64 billion


of activity via the store.


If you use the 30% maximum com-


mission, that’s some $20 billion in rev-


enue, a little over a third of the $57 bil-


lion in calendar-2020 services revenue.


That’s consistent with app tracker Sen-


sor Tower, which estimates Apple’s


2020 take from the store at $21.7 bil-


lion. (For Google, it says it’s $11.6 bil-


lion.) That means about 7% of Apple


revenue is at risk if the App Store is


regulated. But a reduced fee seems the


likeliest scenario, so the true risk is


probably smaller.


Apple’s vulnerability is real, but


modest. Investors seem unconcerned.B


By Eric J. Savitz


Apple seems increasingly likely to face


litigation over its App Store policies and its


dominant role in app distribution. The risk


to Apple’s revenue is real but modest.


Investors appear unconcerned.


Bigtunaonline/Dreamstime
Free download pdf