GROUP THEORY
and settingX=I′gives
I′=I′•I. (28.10)
It then follows from (28.9), (28.10) thatI=I′, showing that in any particular
group the identity element is unique.
In a similar way it can be shown that the inverse of any particular element
is unique. IfUandVare two postulated inverses of an elementXofG,by
considering the product
U•(X•V)=(U•X)•V,
it can be shown thatU=V. The proof is left to the reader.
Given the uniqueness of the inverse of any particular group element, it follows
that
(U•V•···•Y•Z)•(Z−^1 • Y−^1 • ···•V−^1 • U−^1 )
=(U•V•···•Y)•(Z•Z−^1 )•(Y−^1 • ···•V−^1 • U−^1 )
=(U•V•···•Y)•(Y−^1 • ···•V−^1 • U−^1 )
..
.
=I,
where use has been made of the associativity and of the two equationsZ•Z−^1 =I
andI•X=X. Thus the inverse of a product is the product of the inverses in
reverse order, i.e.
(U•V•···•Y•Z)−^1 =(Z−^1 • Y−^1 • ···•V−^1 • U−^1 ). (28.11)
Further elementary results that can be obtained by arguments similar to those
above are as follows.
(i) Given any pair of elementsX, Y belonging toG, there exist unique
elementsU, V, also belonging toG, such that
X•U=Y and V•X=Y.
ClearlyU=X−^1 • Y,andV=Y•X−^1 , and they can be shown to be
unique. This result is sometimes called thedivision axiom.
(ii) Thecancellation lawcan be stated as follows. If
X•Y=X•Z
for someXbelonging toG,thenY=Z.Similarly,
Y•X=Z•X
implies the same conclusion.