REPRESENTATION THEORY
of a particular group of symmetry operations has been brought to irreducible
form, the implications are as follows.
(i) Those components of the basis vector that correspond to rows in the
representation matrices with a single-entry block, i.e. a 1×1block,are
unchanged by the operations of the group. Such a coordinate or function
is said to transform according to a one-dimensional irrep ofG.Inthe
example given in (29.10), that the entry on the third row forms a 1× 1
block implies that the third entry in the basis vector (xyz···)T,
namelyz, is invariant under the two-dimensional symmetry operations on
an equilateral triangle in thexy-plane.
(ii) If, in any of thegmatrices of the representation, the largest-sized block
located on the row or column corresponding to a particular coordinate
(or function) in the basis vector isn×n, then that coordinate (or function)
is mixed by the symmetry operations withn−1 others and is said to
transform according to ann-dimensional irrep ofG. Thus in the matrix
(29.10),xis the first entry in the complete basis vector; the first row of
the matrix contains two non-zero entries, as does the first column, and so
xis part of a two-component basis vector whose components are mixed
by the symmetry operations ofG. The other component isy.
The result (29.11) may also be formulated in terms of the more abstract notion
of vector spaces (chapter 8). The set ofgmatrices that forms ann-dimensional
representationDof the groupGcan be thought of as acting on column matrices
corresponding to vectors in ann-dimensional vector spaceVspanned by the basis
functions of the representation. If there exists aproper subspaceWofV,such
that if a vector whose column matrix iswbelongs toWthen the vector whose
column matrix isD(X)walso belongs toW, for allXbelonging toG,thenit
follows thatDis reducible. We say that the subspaceWis invariant under the
actions of the elements ofG. WithDunitary, the orthogonal complementW⊥of
W,i.e.thevectorspaceVremaining when the subspaceWhas been removed, is
also invariant, and all the matricesD(X) split into two blocks acting separately
onWandW⊥.BothW andW⊥may contain further invariant subspaces, in
which case the matrices will be split still further.
As a concrete example of this approach, consider in plane polar coordinates
ρ, φthe effect of rotations about the polar axis on the infinite-dimensional vector
spaceVof all functions ofφthat satisfy the Dirichlet conditions for expansion
as a Fourier series (see section 12.1). We take as our basis functions the set
{sinmφ,cosmφ}for integer valuesm=0, 1 , 2 ,...; this is an infinite-dimensional
representation (n=∞) and, since a rotation about the polar axis can be through
any angleα(0≤α< 2 π), the groupGis a subgroup of the continuous rotation
group and has its ordergformally equal to infinity.