1.4 PARTIAL FRACTIONS
in partial fractions, i.e. to write it as
f(x)=
g(x)
h(x)
=
4 x+2
x^2 +3x+2
=
A 1
(x−α 1 )n^1
+
A 2
(x−α 2 )n^2
+···.
(1.43)
The first question that arises is that of how many terms there should be on
the right-hand side (RHS). Although some complications occur whenh(x)has
repeated roots (these are considered below) it is clear thatf(x) only becomes
infinite at thetwovalues ofx,α 1 andα 2 , that makeh(x) = 0. Consequently the
RHS can only become infinite at the same two values ofxand therefore contains
only two partial fractions – these are the ones shown explicitly. This argument
can be trivially extended (again temporarily ignoring the possibility of repeated
roots ofh(x)) to show that ifh(x) is a polynomial of degreenthen there should be
nterms on the RHS, each containing a different rootαiof the equationh(αi)=0.
A second general question concerns the appropriate values of theni.Thisis
answered by putting the RHS over a common denominator, which will clearly
have to be the product (x−α 1 )n^1 (x−α 2 )n^2 ···. Comparison of the highest power
ofxin this new RHS with the same power inh(x)showsthatn 1 +n 2 +···=n.
This result holds whether or noth(x) = 0 has repeated roots and, although we
do not give a rigorous proof, strongly suggests the following correct conclusions.
- The number of terms on the RHS is equal to the number ofdistinctroots of
h(x) = 0, each term having a different rootαiin its denominator (x−αi)ni.
- Ifαiis a multiple root ofh(x) = 0 then the value to be assigned toniin (1.43) is
that ofmiwhenh(x) is written in the product form (1.9). Further, as discussed
on p. 23,Aihas to be replaced by a polynomial of degreemi−1. This is also
formally true for non-repeated roots, since then bothmiandniare equal to
unity.
Returning to our specific example we note that the denominatorh(x) has zeros
atx=α 1 =−1andx=α 2 =−2; thesex-values are the simple (non-repeated)
roots ofh(x) = 0. Thus the partial fraction expansion will be of the form
4 x+2
x^2 +3x+2
=
A 1
x+1
+
A 2
x+2
. (1.44)
We now list several methods available for determining the coefficientsA 1 and
A 2. We also remind the reader that, as with all the explicit examples and techniques
described, these methods are to be considered as models for the handling of any
ratio of polynomials, with or without characteristics that make it a special case.
(i) The RHS can be put over a common denominator, in this case (x+1)(x+2),
and then the coefficients of the various powers ofxcan be equated in the