25.4 SUMMATION OF SERIES
By considering
∮
C
πcotπz
(a+z)^2
dz,
whereais not an integer andCis a circle of large radius, evaluate
∑∞
n=−∞
1
(a+n)^2
.
The integrand has (i) simple poles atz= integern,for−∞<n<∞, due to the factor
cotπzand (ii) a double pole atz=−a.
(i) To find the residue of cotπz, putz=n+ξfor smallξ:
cotπz=
cos(nπ+ξπ)
sin(nπ+ξπ)
≈
cosnπ
(cosnπ)ξπ
=
1
ξπ
.
The residue of the integrand atz=nis thusπ(a+n)−^2 π−^1.
(ii) Puttingz=−a+ξfor smallξand determining the coefficient ofξ−^1 gives§
πcotπz
(a+z)^2
=
π
ξ^2
cot(−aπ+ξπ)
=
π
ξ^2
{
cot(−aπ)+ξ
[
d
dz
(cotπz)
]
z=−a
+···
}
,
so that the residue at the double polez=−ais given by
π[−πcosec^2 πz]z=−a=−π^2 cosec^2 πa.
Collecting together these results to express the residue theorem gives
I=
∮
C
πcotπz
(a+z)^2
dz=2πi
[ N
∑
n=−N
1
(a+n)^2
−π^2 cosec^2 πa
]
, (25.23)
whereNequals the integer part ofR. But as the radiusRofCtends to∞,cotπz→∓i
(depending on whether Imzis greater or less than zero, respectively). Thus
I<k
∫
dz
(a+z)^2
,
which tends to 0 asR→∞. ThusI→0asR(and henceN)→∞, and (25.23) establishes
the result
∑∞
n=−∞
1
(a+n)^2
=
π^2
sin^2 πa
.
Series with alternating signs in the terms, i.e. (−1)n, can also be attempted
in this way but using cosecπzrather than cotπz, since the former has residue
(−1)nπ−^1 atz=n(see exercise 25.11).
§This again illustrates one of the techniques for determining residues.