TENSORS
Scalars behave differently under transformations, however, since they remain
unchanged. For example, the value of the scalar product of two vectorsx·y
(which is just a number) is unaffected by the transformation from the unprimed
to the primed basis. Different again is the behaviour of linear operators. If a
linear operatorAis represented by some matrixAin a given coordinate system
then in the new (primed) coordinate system it is represented by a new matrix,
A′=S−^1 AS.
In this chapter we develop a general formulation to describe and classify these
different types of behaviour under a change of basis (or coordinate transfor-
mation). In the development, the generic nametensoris introduced, and certain
scalars, vectors and linear operators are described respectively as tensors of ze-
roth, first and second order (theorder–orrank– corresponds to the number of
subscripts needed to specify a particular element of the tensor). Tensors of third
and fourth order will also occupy some of our attention.
26.3 Cartesian tensors
We begin our discussion of tensors by considering a particular class of coordinate
transformation – namely rotations – and we shall confine our attention strictly
to the rotation of Cartesian coordinate systems. Our object is to study the prop-
erties of various types of mathematical quantities, and their associated physical
interpretations, when they are described in terms of Cartesian coordinates and
the axes of the coordinate system are rigidly rotated from a basise 1 ,e 2 ,e 3 (lying
along theOx 1 ,Ox 2 andOx 3 axes) to a new onee′ 1 ,e′ 2 ,e′ 3 (lying along theOx′ 1 ,
Ox′ 2 andOx′ 3 axes).
Since we shall be more interested in how the components of a vector or linear
operator are changed by a rotation of the axes than in the relationship between
the two sets of basis vectorseiande′i, let us define the transformation matrixL
as the inverse of the matrixSin (26.2). Thus, from (26.2), the components of a
position vectorx, in the old and new bases respectively, are related by
x′i=Lijxj. (26.4)
Because we are considering only rigid rotations of the coordinate axes, the
transformation matrixLwill be orthogonal, i.e. such thatL−^1 =LT.Therefore
the inverse transformation is given by
xi=Ljix′j. (26.5)
The orthogonality ofLalso implies relations among the elements ofLthat
express the fact thatLLT=LTL=I. In subscript notation they are given by
LikLjk=δij and LkiLkj=δij. (26.6)
Furthermore, in terms of the basis vectors of the primed and unprimed Cartesian