186 CHAPTER 5 ALGEBRA
which equals
(a -b) (x -y) + (a -c) (x -z) + (b -c) (y -z),
and this is positive. If you ponder this argument, you will realize that it generalizes to
any value of n.
Chebyshev's inequality is much less popular than either AM-GM or Cauchy
Schwarz, but it deserves a place on your toolbelt. In particular, the argument that
we used to prove it can be adapted to many other situations.
Problems and Exercises
5.5.24 Show that
I I I
1+ - + - + - + ... < (^3).
1! 2! 3!
(You have probably learned in a calculus course that
this sum is equal to e ::::: 2.718. But that's cheating!
Use "low-tech" methods.)
5.5.25 Reread the argument about the monotonicity of
the function in Example 5.5.10 on page 175. How does
this relate to the symmetry-product principle?
5.5.26 Rediscover Cauchy's ingenious proof of the
AM-GM inequality for n variables with the following
hints.
(a) First use induction to prove that AM-GM is true
as long as the number of variables is a power of
2.
(b) Next, suppose that you know that AM-GM was
true for four variables, and you want to prove
that it was true for three variables. In other
words, you wish to prove that
x + y + Z > ,r;:;;;;
3
- _yxyz (12)
for all positive x, y, z, and you are allowed to use
the fact that
a+b+c+d >
\!abcd
4 -
(13)
for all positive a, b, c, d. Can you think of some
clever things to substitute for a, b, c, d in (13)
that will transform it into (12)?
(c) Generalize this method to devise a way to go
backward from the 2' -variable AM-GM case
down to AM-GM with any smaller number of
variables (down to 2 r-I).
5.5.27 For which integer n is lin closest to
VI,OOO, OOO -y'999,999?
No calculators, please!
( + I)
n
5.5.28 Prove that n! < T ,forn=2,3,4, ....
5.5.29 (IMO 1976) Determine, with proof, the largest
number that is the product of positive integers whose
sum is 1976. Hint: try an "algorithmic" approach.
5.5.30 Example 3.1.12 on page 71 demonstrated the
factorization
a^3 + b^3 + c^3 - 3abc =
(a +b+ c)(a^2 + b^2 +c^2 -ab - bc -ac).
Use this to prove the AM-GM inequality for three vari
ables. Does this method generalize?
5.5.31 Show that
_I « �) (�) ... (2n-I)<_I.
J4rl - 2 4 2n ffn
5.5.32 Let aI, a 2 , ... , an be a sequence of positive
numbers. Show that for all positive x,
( al +a 2 +" '+an)
n
(x+at}(x+a 2 )'" (x+an) � x+
n
5.5.33 Find all ordered pairs of positive real numbers
(x,y) such that xY = y. Notice that the set of pairs of
the form (t,t) where t is any positive number is not the
full solution, since 24 = 42 •
5.5.34 Show that
vai+bi+�+"'+�^2
V(al +a 2 +···+an)^2 +(bl +b 2 +···+bn)^2
for all real values of the variables, and give a condition
for equality to hold. Algebraic methods will certainly
work, but there must be a better way ...