550 12 Chemical Reaction Mechanisms I: Rate Laws and Mechanisms
A. Construct a possible set of steps.
- The steps must add up to the correct stoichiometry (possibly multiplying one or
more of the steps by constants before adding). - If the mechanism has two steps, there must be at least one reactive intermediate.
Three steps require two reactive intermediates, etc. Reactive intermediates must
cancel in the addition of the steps: They must occur on the right-hand side of one
step equation and on the left-hand side of a later step equation. - Let your knowledge of chemistry guide the choice of a proposed mechanism.
i. The breaking of a weak bond is more likely than the breaking of a strong
bond.
ii. Reactive intermediates should have reasonable structures. In a gas-phase reac-
tion, reactive intermediates with nonzero charges are not very likely, but free
radicals are more likely. In a reaction in an aqueous solution, intermediates
with nonzero charges are more likely than are free radicals.
B. Choose the rate-limiting step approximation or the quasi-steady-state approximation.
- If the experimental rate law has definite orders, try the rate-limiting step approx-
imation.
i. If no products appear in the rate law for the forward reaction, it is possible
that the first step is the rate-limiting step.
ii. If there are some reactants that do not appear in the rate law for the forward
reaction, these substances occur only in steps after the rate-limiting step.
iii. If negative orders or fractional orders occur in the rate law, the rate-limiting
step cannot be the first step.
iv. Substances with positive orders have a larger sum of stoichiometric coeffi-
cients on the left-hand sides of step equations up to and including the rate-
limiting step, and substances with negative orders have a larger sum of stoi-
chiometric coefficients on the right-hand sides of step equations prior to the
rate-limiting step.
- If the rate law has a denominator with two or more terms, try the steady-state
approximation.
C. Deduce the rate law for your proposed mechanism and compare it with the experi-
mental rate law. If it does not agree, try again with another proposed mechanism.
Let us examine a few hypothetical examples.
EXAMPLE12.14
If the stoichiometry of the reaction is
aA+bB−→cC+dD (12.4-35)
and if the rate law is
rateki[A]a[B]b (12.4-36)
find a mechanism that conforms to this rate law.