694 16 The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. II. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics
coordinates, but the wave function vanishes outside of the box, and we can omit that part of
the integration:
∫∞
−∞
ψ 1 (x)ψ 2 (x)dxC^2
∫a
0
sin
(
πx
a
)
sin
(
2 πx
a
)
dxC^2
a
π
∫π
0
sin(y) sin(2y)dy 0
where we have looked the integral up in Appendix C. One can also make a rough graph of
the integrand and argue that the positive and negative contributions to the integral cancel
each other.
Property 6, that two commuting hermitian operators can have a set of common
eigenfunctions, means the following: If ̂AandB̂are two hermitian operators that
commute with each other, then a set of functionsfjk(q) can be found such that
Af̂ jk(q)ajfjk(q) (16.3-32)
Bf̂ jk(q)bkfjk(q) (16.3-33)
whereajandbkare constant eigenvalues. Two indices are needed on the functions in
the set, because two functions can have the same eigenvalue forÂbut have different
eigenvalues forB̂. An example of simultaneous eigenfunctions is found in the elec-
tronic wave functions of the hydrogen atom, which are simultaneous eigenfunctions of
the Hamiltonian operator and two angular momentum operators. We discuss these in
Chapter 17.
The completeness property specified in Property 7 means that an arbitrary function
ψthat obeys the same boundary conditions as the set of eigenfunctions of a hermi-
tian operator̂Acan be exactly represented as alinear combination(sum of functions
multiplied by constant coefficients) of all of the eigenfunctions ofÂ.
ψ
∑∞
j 1
cjfj (16.3-34)
wheref 1 ,f 2 ,f 3 ,...are the set of eigenfunctions. This set of functions is called the
basis setor the set ofbasis functions. The functionψis said to beexpandedin terms
of the basis functions. The coefficientsc 1 ,c 2 ,c 3 ,...are calledexpansion coefficients.
There are generally infinitely many eigenfunctions of a given operator, and all of them
must be included in the sum of Eq. (16.3-34) for the representation to be exact. There
is apparently no general proof that the eigenfunctions of a hermitian operator form
a complete set. However, there are no known counterexamples, and this assertion is
generally accepted.
We can represent a time-dependent wave function in terms of time-independent
basis functions if the expansion coefficients have the correct time dependence. For
example, in Eq. (15.3-20) we chose the energy eigenfunctions as the basis functions
and wrote
Ψ(x,t)
∑∞
n 1
Ane−iEnt/h ̄ψn(x) (16.3-35)
where the coefficientsA 1 ,A 2 ,...are constants. It was shown in Example 15.3 that
this function satisfies the time-dependent Schrödinger equation.