A Climate for Change

(Chris Devlin) #1

(^232) Conclusions: A Climate for Change – Findings and Recommendations Human Development Report - Croatia 2008



  • Human health – especially among older people

    • will experience increased risks due to heat
      waves during the summer. However, mild win-
      ter temperatures are likely to reduce the health
      problems caused by cold weather. Addition-
      ally, changes in allergen patterns may also cause
      problems for certain groups.



  • Hydropower production may decrease due to
    reduced river flow, and wetlands benefits may
    be endangered due to less precipitation.

  • Agricultural production may experience a drop
    in the yields of various crops.
    The fisheries and mariculture industries should
    benefit from the increased production of certain
    types of fish and shellfish, although invasive spe-
    cies and sea temperatures may reduce the num-
    ber of other species.

  • Climate change will not affect all Croatians
    equally. Certain groups in society face a greater risk
    from future climate change. These include residents
    of certain regions that face the double burden of low
    incomes and employment in/ reliance on weather-
    sensitive industries. They also include the elderly, who
    face added health risks due to heat waves. Addition-
    ally, poorer segments of society may find it difficult
    to cope with rising commodity prices (including en-
    ergy and food) because of limited income. For both
    groups, climate change may be a threat multiplier,
    making existing difficulties more severe. Groups at
    greater risk will require special attention.

  • Looking towards 2020, many possibilities ex-
    ist that will enable Croatia to reduce its emis-
    sions. Preliminary analysis shows that Croatia
    should be able to reduce its emissions beyond
    the 1990 official baseline levels – perhaps by as
    much as 30%. The costs for this reduction are es-
    timated to be between approximately EUR 114.7
    million and EUR 535.9 million for that year. This
    is equivalent to 0.31%-1.43% of 2007’s GDP. They
    include energy efficiency measures, sustainable
    transportation policies, renewable energy poli-
    cies, measures to encourage fugitive methane uti-
    lization, introduction of more renewable energy
    and changes in industrial production processes.
    Furthermore, the potential for GHG “sinks” in Cro-
    atia is quite large, though this reduction measure
    may not be fully eligible for international negoti-
    ations. Forest cover and carbon content increases
    in soils could have a huge impact on emissions
    reductions, though the costs and benefits need
    to be further explored. In order to carry out these
    measures, tremendous public, private sector,
    and Government involvement will be necessary.
    Potential, though more controversial, measures
    also exist, such as the development of nuclear
    power and the incineration of waste products for
    energy. These have been identified as potentially
    cost-effective but may not be feasible for reasons
    of environmental sustainability and public resis-
    tance. See Box 14-1 for more information on how
    this analysis is related to the current Energy Strat-
    egy in Croatia.

Free download pdf