Human Development Report - Croatia 2008 Conclusions: A Climate for Change – Findings and Recommendations^235
GHG projections
Projections of GHG emissions are provided for the
energy sector and for total national emissions levels
(Figure 14-2). Emissions in non-energy sectors were
assumed to remain nearly constant. Projections are
presented for the three SES scenarios described
above: Blue, Green and White. BAU scenario projec-
tions are not presented.
The main measures implemented in these scenarios
are as follows:
- Renewable energy sources
In all scenarios, 20% of final energy consump-
tion is produced by renewable sources. Ap-
proximately 35% of electricity in all scenarios
is produced from renewable sources by the
year 2020. In addition to production from large
hydro plants, 4.0 TWh will be produced from
new sources. The scenarios also assume a large
increase in renewable energy from the produc-
tion of heat and steam. For industrial energy
production, biodegradable waste is introduced
in cement production, and communal waste
incineration is used for heat. In transport, 10%
of energy will be from biofuels. - Energy efficiency in the end-use sector
By 2016 energy efficiency measures should re-
duce consumption by 19.77 PJ. This represents
9% of the average consumption from the pe-
riod 2001-2005. While energy consumption is
likely to increase during this period, efficiency
should improve. The same increased efficiency
rate should continue until 2020. - Energy efficiency in production
New power plants will be considerably more
efficient. A new 400 MW combined heat and
power plant is proposed along with 100 MW in
micro-cogeneration.
- Fuel conversion
Liquid fuel is replaced by other sources for the
production of electricity. - Nucelar power
Nuclear energy is proposed in two scenarios
Green and White, becoming operational in 2019. - Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
technology
The Green Paper assumes CCS technology
implementation at both new and older coal
plants after 2020. - Emissions trading
Emissions trading and the use of other Kyoto
flexible mechanisms are assumed. The use of
emissions trading is proposed to bridge the
period prior to the commercialization of CCS
technology for coal plants.
With the above measures, Croatia would be able to
stabilise its emissions between 32 – 34 MtCO 2 /eq
after 2020 under all three scenarios. The use of CCS
technology and the use of nuclear energy pose un-
certainties similar to those in many other countries.
It might be concluded that any additional cost-
effective measures to reduce GHG emissions in the
energy sector and other sectors are very important
for Croatia (as analysed in Chapter 12). The eco-
nomic and technical feasibility is not the only factor
in implementation. For many additional measures,
implementation depends on how successfully bar-
riers will be removed. Social and environmental fac-
tors are related not only to issues such as nuclear
energy, but also to measures in agriculture, land use
change, waste management and forestry.