Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches

(Brent) #1
ANALYSIS OF QUANTITATIVE DATA

NOTES



  1. Practical advice on coding and handling quantitative
    data comes from survey research. See discussions in
    Babbie (1998:366–372), Backstrom and Hursh-Cesar
    (1981:309–400), Fowler (1984:127–133), Sonquist and
    Dunkelberg (1977:210–215), and Warwick and Lininger
    (1975:234–291).

  2. Note that coding gender as 1 Male, 2 Female, or
    as 0 Male, 1 Female, or reversing the gender for
    numbers is arbitrary. The only reason one uses numbers
    instead of letters (e.g., M and F) is that many computer
    programs work best with all numbers. Sometimes cod-
    ing data as a zero can create confusion, so the number 1
    is usually the lowest value.

  3. For discussions of many different ways to display
    quantitative data, see Fox (1992), Henry (1995), Tufte
    (1983, 1991), and Zeisel (1985:14–33).

  4. Other statistics measure special types of means for
    ordinal data and for other special situations, which are
    beyond the level of discussion in this book.

  5. On the elaboration paradigm and its history, see Bab-
    bie (1998:400–409) and Rosenberg (1968).
    6. Beginning students and people outside the social sci-
    ences are sometimes surprised at the low (10 to 50 per-
    cent) predictive accuracy in multiple regression results.
    There are three responses to this. First, a 10 to 50 per-
    cent reduction in errors is really not bad compared to
    purely random guessing. Second, positivist social sci-
    ence is still developing. Although the levels of accuracy
    may not be as high as those of the physical sciences, they
    are much higher than for any explanation of the social
    world possible 10 or 20 years ago. Finally, the theoreti-
    cally important issue in most multiple regression mod-
    els is less the accuracy of overall prediction than the
    effects of specific variables. Most hypotheses involve the
    effects of specific independent variables on dependent
    variables.
    7. In formal hypothesis testing, we test the null hypoth-
    esis and usually want to reject the null because rejection
    of the null indirectly supports the alternative hypothesis
    to the null, the one we deduce from theory as a tentative
    explanation. The null hypothesis was discussed in
    Chapter 6.

Free download pdf