ANALYSIS OF QUALITATIVE DATA
us to use statistical procedures. Qualitative analy-
sis requires more effort to read and reread data
notes, reflect on what is read, and make compar-
isons based on logic and judgment.
Most forms of qualitative data analysis involve
coding and writing analytic memos. Both are labor-
intensive and time-intensive efforts. They require
reading data carefully and thinking about them
seriously. In addition, the chapter presented
methods we used for the analysis of qualitative data.
The techniques presented in this chapter are only a
sample of the full range of qualitative data analysis
techniques. The chapter discussed also the impor-
tance of thinking about negative evidence and
events that are not present in the data.
KEY TERMS
analytic comparison
analytic domain
axial coding
cultural domain
domain analysis
empty boxes
event structure analysis (ESA)
folk domain
historical contingency
illustrative method
method of agreement
method of difference
mixed domain
narrative analysis
negative case method
open coding
outcropping
path dependency
periodization
qualitative comparative
analysis (QCA)
selective coding
successive approximation
REVIEW QUESTIONS
1.Identify four differences between quantitative and qualitative data analysis.
2.How does the process of conceptualization differ for qualitative and quantitative
research?
3.How does data coding differ in quantitative and qualitative research, and what are
the three types of coding used by a qualitative researcher?
4.What is the purpose of analytic memo writing in qualitative data analysis?
5.Describe successive approximation.
6.What are the empty boxesin the illustrative method, and how are they used?
7.What is the difference between the method of agreement and the method of dif-
ference? Can a researcher use both together? Explain why or why not.
8.What are the parts of a domain, and how are they used in domain analysis?
9.What are the major features of a narrative?
10.Why is it important to look for negative evidence, or things that do not appear in
the data, for a full analysis?
NOTES
- See Miles and Huberman (1994) and Ragin (1987).
These should not be confused with statistical techniques
for “qualitative” data (see Haberman, 1978). These are
sophisticated statistical techniques (e.g., logit and log
linear) for quantitative variables in which the data are at
nominal or ordinal levels. They are better labeled as tech-
niques for categorical data.